comp.databases.theory

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Identity modelling
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Identity modelling
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Codd and non-simple domains
  • From: devajyoti . sarkar
• Re: Identity modelling
  • From: x
• Re: Identity modelling
  • From: x
• Re: Identity modelling (was: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment)
  • From: x
• Re: Identity modelling
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: dawn
• Re: Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Identity modelling
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: BobTheDataBaseBoy
• Re: Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: BobTheDataBaseBoy
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: dawn
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: Dan
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: paul c
• Re: Identity modelling
  • From: paul c
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: dawn
• Re: Identity modelling
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Identity modelling
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Identity modelling (was: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment)
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Identity modelling (was: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment)
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: x
• Re: Identity modelling
  • From: Christopher Browne
• Re: Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: x
• Re: Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: x
• Re: Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: x
• Re: Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: DM Unseen
• Re: Identity modelling (was: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment)
  • From: x
• Conceptual, Logical, and Physical views of data
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Identity modelling (was: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment)
  • From: x
• Re: Identity modelling (was: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment)
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: x
• Re: Identity modelling (was: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment)
  • From: dawn
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: dawn
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Identity modelling (was: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: AK
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: x
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: x
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: x
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: x
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: x
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: x
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: dawn
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: dawn
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy" (and table/class)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Tables - Physical??? Was: Use of the term "hierarchy" (and table/class)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy" (and table/class)
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy" (and table/class)
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy" (and table/class)
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy" (and table/class)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: dawn
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy" (and table/class)
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Modeling Address using Relational Theory
  • From: dawn
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: dawn
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy" (and table/class)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: dawn
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Are there terms for these?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Web resources for teaching data base design.
  • From: huychat2005
• Use of the term "hierarchy"
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Are there terms for these?
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Web resources for teaching data base design.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Are there terms for these?
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Are there terms for these?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Are there terms for these?
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Are there terms for these?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Are there terms for these?
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Paul
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: vldm10
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Mike
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Soliciting Architecture Opinions
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: <bits OT> dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: 11
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: 11
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Alan
• Re: <bits OT> dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: paul c
• Re: <bits OT> dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: BobTheDataBaseBoy
• 11
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: SQL Humor
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: SQL Humor
  • From: Paul
• Re: Soliciting Architecture Opinions
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Paul
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Paul
• Soliciting Architecture Opinions
  • From: mjcr_2003_2005
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: FRAN
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: Is there any way I can make garbage collection aggressive in SQL 2000 or 2005?
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Is there any way I can make garbage collection aggressive in SQL 2000 or 2005?
  • From: Nimesh
• Re: Is there any way I can make garbage collection aggressive in SQL 2000 or 2005?
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Is there any way I can make garbage collection aggressive in SQL 2000 or 2005?
  • From: Nimesh
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: FRAN
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: AK
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Paul
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Eric Junkermann
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Paul
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: Is there any way I can make garbage collection aggressive in SQL 2000 or 2005?
  • From: Paul
• Is there any way I can make garbage collection aggressive in SQL 2000 or 2005?
  • From: Nimesh
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: <bits OT> dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: <bits OT> dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: New advanced book on index design
  • From: Lauri
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: fran_beta
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: fran_beta
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: New advanced book on index design
  • From: BobTheDataBaseBoy
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: fran_beta
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: fran_beta
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: vldm10
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: vldm10
• New advanced book on index design
  • From: Lauri
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: <bits OT> dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: Advice on SQL and records
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Advice on SQL and records
  • From: fran_beta
• Re: SQL Humor
  • From: Paul
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: JGE
• Re: SQL Humor
  • From: paul c
• Re: SQL Humor
  • From: paul c
• Re: SQL Humor
  • From: paul c
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Alex Papadimoulis
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: paul c
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Dan
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Dan
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Alex Papadimoulis
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Tony Andrews
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: paul c
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: JGE
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Oids
  • From: vc
• Re: Oids
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Oids
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: dawn
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: John
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Troels Arvin
• dbdebunk 'Quote of Week' comment
  • From: Mike Meng
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: x
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: x
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: x
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: VC
• Re: Oids
  • From: VC
• Re: Oids
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Oids
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Oids
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Oids
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Oids
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Oids
  • From: VC
• Re: Oids
  • From: VC
• Re: Oids
  • From: VC
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: dawn
• Re: Oids
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Oids
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Oids
  • From: vc
• Re: Oids
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Oids
  • From: vc
• Oids
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Dee Dum
  • From: vc
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: vc
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: vc
• Re: Dee Dum
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: vc
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Dee Dum
  • From: vc
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Dee Dum
  • From: vc
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Dee Dum
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Dee Dum
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Dee Dum
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: NIAM (was: Just one more anecdote)
  • From: DM Unseen
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: x
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: x
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: vc
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: x
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: vc
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: x
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: x
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: VC
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: VC
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: VC
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: VC
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: x
• Non sequitur
  • From: David Cressey
• The database environment (was: The word "symbol")
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: vc
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: vc
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: vc
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: vc
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: vc
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: vc
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: VC
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: x
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: <OT> The naive test for equality
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: Validation Macro
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: VC
• Validation Macro
  • From: Keith Austin
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Acronyms (was: dirty data (was: The naive test for equality))
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: dawn
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: vc
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: vc
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: vc
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: dawn
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: dawn
• Quantum Gravity (Was: Intervals (Was: NIAM (was: Just one more anecdote)))
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: VC
• Re: Intervals (Was: NIAM (was: Just one more anecdote))
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: dawn
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: Semiotics
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Semiotics
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Semiotics
  • From: Alan
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Paul
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Paul
• Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: APL, J or K?
  • From: Lauri
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: APL, J or K?
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• APL, J or K?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Acronyms (was: dirty data (was: The naive test for equality))
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Semiotics
  • From: VC
• Re: Semiotics
  • From: Paul
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: David Cressey
• Acronyms (was: dirty data (was: The naive test for equality))
  • From: David Cressey
• Semiotics
  • From: David Cressey
• OT: English terms
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: VC
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: VC
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Bill H
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Bill H
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Bill H
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: Lauri
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: VC
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: VC
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: dirty data
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: VC
• Re: NIAM (was: Just one more anecdote)
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: vc
• Re: Meta: The word "symbol"
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: dirty data (was: The naive test for equality)
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Intervals
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: vc
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Tony Andrews
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: vc
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: vc
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Paul
• ASIMOV (Was: sql views for denomalizing)
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Intervals (Was: NIAM (was: Just one more anecdote))
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: Paul
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Paul
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: dirty data
  • From: paul c
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: VC
• Re: The word "symbol"
  • From: VC
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Intervals (Was: NIAM (was: Just one more anecdote))
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• NIAM (was: Just one more anecdote)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Meta: The word "symbol"
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: David Cressey
• dirty data (was: The naive test for equality)
  • From: mAsterdam
• The word "symbol"
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: vc
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Paul
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Paul
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: vc
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: dawn
• Performance Issue
  • From: hami_hce2002
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: VC
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: dawn
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: VC
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: VC
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: VC
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Paul
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Paul
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: any sources of obscure (and not so obscure) database design strategies?
  • From: PD
• Re: any sources of obscure (and not so obscure) database design strategies?
  • From: PD
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: any sources of obscure (and not so obscure) database design strategies?
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: vc
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: dawn
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: any sources of obscure (and not so obscure) database design strategies?
  • From: paul c
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: paul c
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: paul c
• any sources of obscure (and not so obscure) database design strategies?
  • From: PD
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: VC
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Paul
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: vc
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: erk
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: erk
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Non Sequitur
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: vc
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: x
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Troels Arvin
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: x
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: VC
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: VC
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Non Sequitur
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More stupid database tricks
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: dawn
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Non Sequitur
  • From: dawn
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Paul
• Non Sequitur
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Paul
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: More stupid database tricks
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: VC
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The D Programming Language
  • From: Misha Dorman
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The D Programming Language
  • From: dawn
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: dawn
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: erk
• Re: The D Programming Language
  • From: Richard Harnden
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: erk
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: erk
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: VC
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: dawn
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: VC
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: paul c
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Eric Junkermann
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Eric Junkermann
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Hugo Kornelis
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: André Næss
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: vc
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: vc
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: x
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: dawn
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: dawn
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: VC
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: dawn
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: dawn
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Eric Junkermann
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Patsybulo
• Re: MS Access IT Studies
  • From: Patsybulo
• Database
  • From: Patsybulo
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Paul
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Paul
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Paul
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Paul
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: More stupid database tricks
  • From: Rene_de_Visser
• Re: More stupid database tricks
  • From: AK
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: Jan M. Nelken
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: x
• Re: More stupid database tricks
  • From: Paul
• More stupid database tricks
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• Re: How to build a Datawarehouse schema
  • From: Murukesh Cbe
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• O'Reilly interview with Date
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: VC
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Dan
• Proposed Term: QRM
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Peter Koch Larsen
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Paul
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: dawn
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: sql views for denormalizing
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Transitive Closure in Maine
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: dawn
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Lauri
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: paul c
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: paul c
• Re: The naive test for equality
  • From: DBMS_Plumber
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: dawn
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: dawn
• The naive test for equality
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: DBMS_Plumber
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Lauri
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: paul c
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: paul c
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: paul c
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: paul c
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: dawn
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: dawn
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Transitive Closure in Maine
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: dawn
• Re: Relieving the Boredom
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: paul c
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: paul c
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: paul c
• Types and "join compatibility"
  • From: André Næss
• Re: Transitive Closure in Maine
  • From: dawn
• Re: sql views for denormalizing
  • From: dawn
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: dawn
• Re: sql views for denormalizing
  • From: dawn
• Relieving the Boredom
  • From: David Cressey
• Transitive Closure in Maine
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: How to build a Datawarehouse schema
  • From: David Cressey
• How to build a Datawarehouse schema
  • From: Murukesh Cbe
• Re: sql views for denormalizing
  • From: Lauri
• Re: sql views for denomalizing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: sql views for denormalizing
  • From: dawn
• sql views for denomalizing
  • From: dawn
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Matt Monaghan
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: full text indexing
  • From: Marshall Spight

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(10)