Re: Just one more anecdote
- From: "dawn" <dawnwolthuis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jul 2005 20:36:36 -0700
Marshall Spight wrote:
> dawn wrote:
> >
> > In order to get good, interesting, informed, alternative opinions from
> > people like you, perhaps sometimes I lure you into my lair.
>
> Everyone watch out for her electric mace!
so that I can keep it in my purse for now, would you be so kind as to
arbitrate and let me know why David thinks
"You are treating as proven something this audience generally does not
accept"
when I thought I was clear when I was stating an opinion and that I was
making a conjecture and not stating a proven fact? We definitely have
a communication gap on that one and I'm curious to know where it is.
Thanks in advance. --dawn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Just one more anecdote
- From: Marshall Spight
- Re: Just one more anecdote
- References:
- Just one more anecdote
- From: dawn
- Re: Just one more anecdote
- From: David Cressey
- Re: Just one more anecdote
- From: dawn
- Re: Just one more anecdote
- From: Marshall Spight
- Just one more anecdote
- Prev by Date: Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
- Next by Date: Re: Just one more anecdote
- Previous by thread: Re: Just one more anecdote
- Next by thread: Re: Just one more anecdote
- Index(es):