Re: Just one more anecdote




"dawn" <dawnwolthuis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1122344688.525517.39350@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I'm sure there are numerous factors playing into the fact that the
> system touted in this MS Word document
>
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/casestudies/ShowFile.asp?FileResourceID=1
611
>
> has been discontinued and written off to the tune of $67 million in s/w
> development as seen at
> http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050721/clth018.html?.v=16
>

>From the above, it seems to me that this was an analysis failure, rather
than a design failure.

> This is yet another instance where a legacy system written with a PICK
> (in this case), MUMPS, IMS, or other pre-relational database product
> didn't successfully make the jump to a SQL-RDBMS.
>

Is the axe sharp enough yet, Dawn?

> It is very likely that the conceptual data model and surely the
> subsequent logical data model from which the original system was
> developed would not play to the strengths of the SQL-DBMS. As much as
> we might want to think otherwise, even the design of a conceptual data
> model is influenced by the designer's knowledge of the target dbms. A
> redesign of the data model for a SQL-DBMS is likely to both bump
> features and increase complexity -- a harsh one-two punch.
>

A good conceptual model is implementation neutral. Again, analysis, rather
than design.



> My conjecture is that downgrading, I mean moving, from a graph data
> model to a relational data model and from a PICK dbms to the SQL-DBMS
> were significant factors in this project failure. I could be wrong, of
> course.
>

You are assuming a fact not yet in evidence.

> smiles. --dawn

Is this your way of hinting that you are just jerking the chain on the
denizens of this NG?

>



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Modeling Data for XML instead of SQL-DBMS
    ... data model be in 1NF or the use of the SQL NULL. ... modeling outside of the SQL-DBMS environment. ... a good way to approach the design for this data? ...
    (comp.databases.theory)
  • Re: Just one more anecdote
    ... about project failures and what I have seen. ... >> subsequent logical data model from which the original system was ... >> developed would not play to the strengths of the SQL-DBMS. ... >> we might want to think otherwise, even the design of a conceptual data ...
    (comp.databases.theory)
  • Re: Modeling Data for XML instead of SQL-DBMS
    ... documents and not in an SQL-DBMS, the tools would not require that the ... How would an excellent logical data model designed for this XML ... What would be some best practices for modeling data in ... organization of data can follow recommended OO design. ...
    (comp.databases.theory)
  • Re: Modeling Data for XML instead of SQL-DBMS
    ... documents and not in an SQL-DBMS, the tools would not require that the ... How would an excellent logical data model designed for this XML ... What would be some best practices for modeling data in ... organization of data can follow recommended OO design. ...
    (comp.databases.theory)
  • Re: Modeling Data for XML instead of SQL-DBMS
    ... Storage is irrelevant when talking about the logical data model. ... modeling outside of the SQL-DBMS environment. ... sufficient graphical syntax, it's designed for software design, not database design. ...
    (comp.databases.theory)