Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
- From: "AC" <AC@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:07:44 GMT
"mAsterdam" <mAsterdam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42dd8886$0$76953$e4fe514c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> AC wrote:
>> ...I want to create "base" tables with fields that are intrinsic to the
>> application. I also want to allow the customers using the application to
>> be able to create their own fields so that they can easily customize the
>> application.
<snip/>
>
> If this group would have a FAQ, this Q would be in it.
> For now you'll have to do with googling the archives.
>
> The short answer is: don't go that way, you'll get the worst
> of both worlds.
<snip/>
> It's not a bad question, but I don't like going over the same arguments
> every time it pops up.
Can you post the search string I should use? I did google which is why I
created the subject I did. So that others that were searching for this type
of answer could find it. I don't know how others have described this
scenario. I get a lot of pages on property sheets for programming controls.
I know that this type of setup was used by Symantec ACT but didn't find
references to that either.
Thanks in advance
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: transitive closure
- Next by Date: Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
- Previous by thread: Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
- Next by thread: Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|