comp.databases.theory

• Thread Index

• full text indexing
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Re: When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: Paul
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Re: A simple link, it turns out
  • From: dawn
• Re: A simple link, it turns out
  • From: dawn
• Re: A simple link, it turns out
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Mike
• Re: When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: FrankHamersley
• Re: A simple link, it turns out
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• A simple link, it turns out
  • From: dawn
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Re: Desperately seeking help - db schema
  • From: Paul
• gender - was Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: paul c
• Desperately seeking help - db schema
  • From: piernik
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: DBKEY Datatype
  • From: Paul
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Re: DBKEY Datatype
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Mark D Powell
• Re: DBKEY Datatype
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Just one more anecdote
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: dawn
• Just one more anecdote
  • From: dawn
• Re: When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: AC
• Re: DBKEY Datatype
  • From: Paul
• Re: When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: Paul
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: Marshall Spight
• DBKEY Datatype
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: Paul
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: Tony D
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: dawn
• Re: When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Re: When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: paul c
• Re: When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Marshall Spight
• When does one put data into a separate table?
  • From: Paul
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: dawn
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: AC
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: dawn
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: dawn
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Ghost Town
  • From: Jan M. Nelken
• Ghost Town
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Course Material Available for Intro & Advanced DB Course
  • From: Ellis Cohen
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: dawn
• Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right - amended
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Frank_Hamersley
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Misha Dorman
• Re: are sql shortcuts a good practice ?
  • From: Misha Dorman
• Re: Storing units in the database
  • From: Misha Dorman
• Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right
  • From: Jon Heggland
• What is PI by OSIsoft
  • From: finarfinjge
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right
  • From: Jens Haase
• Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: David Cressey
• 2NF There are two Definitions which is right
  • From: Jens Haase
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: AC
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: AC
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: AC
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: dawn
• Re: Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!!
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!!
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: Neo
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: Neo
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: Neo
• Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!!
  • From: ampharos
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: dawn
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data
  • From: AC
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Neo
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Computational complexity (was Re: Normalisation)
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Computational complexity (was Re: Normalisation)
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Computational complexity (was Re: Normalisation)
  • From: Misha Dorman
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!!
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!!
  • From: ampharos
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: arthernan
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: arthernan
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Neo
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: dawn
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: John
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: transitive closure
  • From: John
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: mAsterdam
• transitive closure
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: paul c
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: dawn
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Drago Ganic
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE (was: Base Normal Form)
  • From: dawn
• Re: Functions are not fundamental to databases. Realtion are.
  • From: dawn
• MS Access IT Studies
  • From: Keith Austin
• C3 linearization MRO
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Proof that relational algebra is eqivalent to FOL
  • From: VC
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: paul c
• Functions are not fundamental to databases. Realtion are.
  • From: Drago Ganic
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Drago Ganic
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Storing units in the database
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Proof that relational algebra is eqivalent to FOL
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Drago Ganic
• Re: Storing units in the database
  • From: Drago Ganic
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Drago Ganic
• Proof that relational algebra is eqivalent to FOL
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE (was: Base Normal Form)
  • From: David Cressey
• What a table is.
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: dawn
• Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key
  • From: dawn
• Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key
  • From: paul c
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Lauri
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: arthernan
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: arthernan
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Dan
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Tony Andrews
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: David Cressey
• Three Kinds of Logical Trees
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: source for RM research
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• dumb terminology question: candidate key
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: are sql shortcuts a good practice ?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: arthernan
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: AK
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: cdt glossary TABLE
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Dan
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: dawn
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: John
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: dawn
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Tony Andrews
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Ken North
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: dawn
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: dawn
• Re: cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form)
  • From: dawn
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: arthernan
• Re: cdt glossary TABLE
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: cdt glossary TABLE
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Eric Junkermann
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: Paul
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: Paul
• Re: Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: arthernan
• Re: source for RM research
  • From: Ach C via DBMonster.com
• Implementation of boolean types.
  • From: Ach C via DBMonster.com
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Storing units in the database
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: arthernan
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Storing units in the database
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• What's the difference between a database architect and a terrorist?
  • From: Casey Hawthorne
• Re: Storing units in the database
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Storing units in the database
  • From: Misha Dorman
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Eric Junkermann
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: dawn
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• Break into the Computer Industry - Get Hired Now
  • From: FindJobEasy
• Re: cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form)
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form)
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: David Cressey
• cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: A
  • From: vc
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: vc
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: A
  • From: Paul
• Re: A
  • From: vc
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: vc
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: A
  • From: Paul
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: VC
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: Paul
• Re: A
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: Paul
• Re: A
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A
  • From: Paul
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• OT Re: A
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: looking for a term
  • From: mAsterdam
• A
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: paul c
• Re: looking for a term
  • From: paul c
• Re: looking for a term
  • From: mAsterdam
• looking for a term
  • From: paul c
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• cdt glossary 0.0.5
  • From: mAsterdam
• cdt glossary - TABLE (was: Base Normal Form)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Good site for data mining resources
  • From: Admin at Eruditionhome
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: vc
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Storing units in the database
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• Re: Storing units in the database
  • From: Neo
• Re: Storing units in the database
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Memorable quotes
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: David Cressey
• Storing units in the database
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Memorable quotes
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: paul c
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Memorable quotes
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: vc
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: paul c
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Memorable quotes
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: vc
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: vc
• are sql shortcuts a good practice ?
  • From: gabriel
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: dawn
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: source for RM research
  • From: falcon
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Paul
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: Mark D Powell
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: vc
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: VC
• Migrating data from a non normalized source like excel to a well designed Database
  • From: Hi5
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: VC
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: VC
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Dan
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: William D. Bartholomew
• Re: source for RM research
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Sub-Entities
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Dan
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Object-Role Modeling?
  • From: Dan
• Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying?
  • From: Dan
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying?
  • From: Dan
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: vc
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Alfredo Novoa
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Paul
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• source for RM research
  • From: falcon
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: VC
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: paul c
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Paul
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Patsybulo
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Patsybulo
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: Mark D Powell
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Base Normal Form
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: paul c
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Paul
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: DM Unseen
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: lauri . pietarinen
• Base Normal Form
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: David Cressey
• Intermediate Relational/Set Theory Text
  • From: William D. Bartholomew
• Re: Sub-Entities
  • From: William D. Bartholomew
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: Mark D Powell
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: VC
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: Mark D Powell
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Sub-Entities
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM
  • From: Neo
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: VC
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Re: Sub-Entities
  • From: William D. Bartholomew
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: VC
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Paul
• Re: Sub-Entities
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Sub-Entities
  • From: Neo
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Sub-Entities
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Sub-Entities
  • From: wbarthol
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: wbarthol
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying?
  • From: Dan
• Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying?
  • From: Dan
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Dan
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: paul c
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Dan
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Dan
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Tom Bradford
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: Neo
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: John
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Patsybulo
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: -CELKO-
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: AK
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Patsybulo
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: Mark D Powell
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Tom Bradford
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Eliminating Nulls
  • From: John
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Eliminating Nulls
  • From: wbarthol
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: arthernan
• Re: A good argument for XML
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• A good argument for XML
  • From: arthernan
• Testing for the equivalence relation
  • From: Dan
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: lauri . pietarinen
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Designing a language database - issues?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM
  • From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Designing a language database - issues?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM
  • From: Neo
• Re: Designing a language database - issues?
  • From: Paul
• Re: Designing a language database - issues?
  • From: Paul
• Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM
  • From: Tony Andrews
• Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM
  • From: John
• Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?
  • From: lauri . pietarinen
• Re: Designing a language database - issues?
  • From: Bruce Baker
• Re: Designing a language database - issues?
  • From: Neo
• Re: Designing a language database - issues?
  • From: Bruce Baker
• Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM
  • From: Neo
• Re: Designing a language database - issues?
  • From: Paul
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Normalisation
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Normalisation
  • From: Patsybulo
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Normalisation
  • From: Patsybulo
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: paul c
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM
  • From: Tony Andrews
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Designing a language database - issues?
  • From: Neo
• Simple Example, How To Model It In RM
  • From: Neo
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: mike
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: mike
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: David Cressey
• Designing a language database - issues?
  • From: Paul
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Newbie question
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: paul c
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: paul c
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Newbie question
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Newbie question
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: vc
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: vc
• Re: Counting links between to records on the same table (Clustering?)
  • From: paul c
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: Counting links between to records on the same table (Clustering?)
  • From: Dale Walker
• Re: Counting links between to records on the same table (Clustering?)
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: David Cressey
• Re: Counting links between to records on the same table (Clustering?)
  • From: paul c
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Timpea
• Counting links between to records on the same table (Clustering?)
  • From: Dale Walker
• Re: the RM and Godel
  • From: Dan
• Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?
  • From: Dan
• Re: What to call this operator?
  • From: paul c
• Re: the distinction between data and intelligence
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: the distinction between data and intelligence
  • From: mountain man
• What to call this operator?
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: the distinction between data and intelligence
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: the RM and Godel
  • From: mountain man
• Re: the distinction between data and intelligence
  • From: mountain man
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Dan Guntermann
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: the distinction between data and intelligence
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: VC
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: the RM and Godel
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Tree constraint in the adjacency graph model
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?
  • From: mountain man
• the RM and Godel
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?
  • From: mountain man
• Re: the distinction between data and intelligence
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: VC
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Neo
• Re: Tree constraint in the adjacency graph model
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Marshall Spight
• Tree constraint in the adjacency graph model
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Newbie question
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: Newbie question
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: query to trace all parents
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Dan
• Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?
  • From: Dan
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Newbie question
  • From: Paul
• Re: the distinction between data and intelligence
  • From: Kenneth Downs
• Re: query to trace all parents
  • From: Stefan Rybacki
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: David Cressey
• Dirty data (was: Newbie question)
  • From: mAsterdam
• Re: the distinction between data and intelligence
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Newbie question
  • From: Jon Heggland
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
  • From: Jon Heggland

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint