comp.databases.theory

• Date Index

• full text indexing, Stefan Rybacki
• A simple link, it turns out, dawn
  • Re: A simple link, it turns out, Alexandr Savinov
    • Re: A simple link, it turns out, dawn
  • Re: A simple link, it turns out, Marshall Spight
    • Re: A simple link, it turns out, dawn
• Desperately seeking help - db schema, piernik
  • Re: Desperately seeking help - db schema, Paul
• Just one more anecdote, dawn
  • Re: Just one more anecdote, Frank_Hamersley
    • Re: Just one more anecdote, Mark D Powell
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, Frank_Hamersley
  • Re: Just one more anecdote, Gene Wirchenko
    • Re: Just one more anecdote, dawn
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, FrankHamersley
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, David Cressey
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, dawn
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, Gene Wirchenko
  • Re: Just one more anecdote, Mike
    • Re: Just one more anecdote, David Cressey
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, dawn
  • Re: Just one more anecdote, David Cressey
    • Re: Just one more anecdote, dawn
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, David Cressey
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, dawn
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, David Cressey
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, dawn
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Just one more anecdote, David Cressey
• DBKEY Datatype, David Cressey
  • Re: DBKEY Datatype, Paul
    • Re: DBKEY Datatype, David Cressey
      • Re: DBKEY Datatype, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: DBKEY Datatype, Paul
• When does one put data into a separate table?, Paul
  • Re: When does one put data into a separate table?, Marshall Spight
  • Re: When does one put data into a separate table?, paul c
    • Re: When does one put data into a separate table?, paul c
  • Re: When does one put data into a separate table?, Tony D
    • Re: When does one put data into a separate table?, Paul
      • Re: When does one put data into a separate table?, Tony D
      • Re: When does one put data into a separate table?, Paul
      • Re: When does one put data into a separate table?, Gene Wirchenko
  • Re: When does one put data into a separate table?, David Cressey
    • Re: When does one put data into a separate table?, Marshall Spight
    • Re: When does one put data into a separate table?, Paul
      • Re: When does one put data into a separate table?, David Cressey
• Ghost Town, Marshall Spight
  • Re: Ghost Town, Jan M. Nelken
    • Re: Ghost Town, Marshall Spight
  • Re: Ghost Town, dawn
  • Re: Ghost Town, David Cressey
    • Re: Ghost Town, Marshall Spight
• Course Material Available for Intro & Advanced DB Course, Ellis Cohen
• What is PI by OSIsoft, finarfinjge
• 2NF There are two Definitions which is right, Jens Haase
  • Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right, Jonathan Leffler
    • Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right, Jens Haase
      • Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right, Jonathan Leffler
      • Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right - amended, Jonathan Leffler
  • Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right, Jon Heggland
    • Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right, Jonathan Leffler
      • Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right, Jon Heggland
    • Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right, Dan Guntermann
• Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, AC
  • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, Marshall Spight
    • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, Neo
    • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, AC
  • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, Neo
  • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, Neo
    • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, AC
  • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, mAsterdam
    • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, AC
      • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, dawn
      • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, AC
      • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, Jonathan Leffler
      • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, David Cressey
      • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, David Cressey
      • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, dawn
      • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, David Cressey
      • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, David Cressey
      • Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data, AC
• Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!!, ampharos
  • Re: Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!!, Vadim Tropashko
    • Re: Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!!, ampharos
      • Re: Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!!, Vadim Tropashko
      • Re: Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!!, Mikito Harakiri
• transitive closure, Marshall Spight
  • Re: transitive closure, John
    • Re: transitive closure, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: transitive closure, John
    • Re: transitive closure, Marshall Spight
  • Re: transitive closure, -CELKO-
    • Re: transitive closure, Marshall Spight
  • Re: transitive closure, Neo
    • Re: transitive closure, Marshall Spight
      • Re: transitive closure, Kenneth Downs
      • Re: transitive closure, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: transitive closure, Neo
      • Re: transitive closure, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: transitive closure, Marshall Spight
  • Re: transitive closure, Marshall Spight
    • Re: transitive closure, David Cressey
      • Re: transitive closure, mAsterdam
      • Re: transitive closure, David Cressey
      • Re: transitive closure, -CELKO-
      • Re: transitive closure, Marshall Spight
      • Re: transitive closure, David Cressey
    • Re: transitive closure, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: transitive closure, Marshall Spight
      • Re: transitive closure, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: transitive closure, -CELKO-
      • Re: transitive closure, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: transitive closure, lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• MS Access IT Studies, Keith Austin
• C3 linearization MRO, mAsterdam
• Proof that relational algebra is eqivalent to FOL, Marshall Spight
  • Re: Proof that relational algebra is eqivalent to FOL, mAsterdam
  • Re: Proof that relational algebra is eqivalent to FOL, VC
• What a table is., David Cressey
• Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Marshall Spight
  • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
    • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Jonathan Leffler
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
      • gender - was Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, paul c
  • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, -CELKO-
    • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, -CELKO-
  • Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees, dawn
• dumb terminology question: candidate key, Marshall Spight
  • Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key, Jonathan Leffler
    • Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key, Marshall Spight
      • Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key, David Cressey
      • Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key, Marshall Spight
      • Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key, dawn
      • Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key, Marshall Spight
  • Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key, paul c
• Implementation of boolean types., Ach C via DBMonster.com
  • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Gene Wirchenko
  • Re: Implementation of boolean types., -CELKO-
    • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Kenneth Downs
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., -CELKO-
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Gene Wirchenko
    • Re: Implementation of boolean types., dawn
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., -CELKO-
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., dawn
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Misha Dorman
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Frank_Hamersley
    • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Jonathan Leffler
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Tony Andrews
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., John
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., -CELKO-
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Jonathan Leffler
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., David Cressey
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Tony Andrews
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Marshall Spight
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Drago Ganic
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Drago Ganic
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Marshall Spight
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., dawn
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Marshall Spight
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., dawn
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Marshall Spight
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., dawn
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Marshall Spight
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., dawn
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., dawn
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Drago Ganic
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., paul c
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Drago Ganic
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., paul c
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., dawn
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Marshall Spight
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Anne & Lynn Wheeler
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., -CELKO-
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Marshall Spight
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., AK
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., -CELKO-
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Marshall Spight
    • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Marshall Spight
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., -CELKO-
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Marshall Spight
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., -CELKO-
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., Marshall Spight
      • Re: Implementation of boolean types., dawn
• What's the difference between a database architect and a terrorist?, Casey Hawthorne
• Break into the Computer Industry - Get Hired Now, FindJobEasy
• cdt glossary 0.0.5, mAsterdam
  • looking for a term, paul c
    • Re: looking for a term, mAsterdam
      • Re: looking for a term, paul c
      • Re: looking for a term, mAsterdam
• Good site for data mining resources, Admin at Eruditionhome
• Storing units in the database, Mikito Harakiri
  • Re: Storing units in the database, Marshall Spight
    • Re: Storing units in the database, Misha Dorman
      • Re: Storing units in the database, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: Storing units in the database, Misha Dorman
    • Re: Storing units in the database, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: Storing units in the database, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Storing units in the database, Drago Ganic
      • Re: Storing units in the database, mAsterdam
  • Re: Storing units in the database, Neo
  • Re: Storing units in the database, Jonathan Leffler
• Memorable quotes, Mikito Harakiri
  • Re: Memorable quotes, Jan Hidders
  • Re: Memorable quotes, -CELKO-
    • Re: Memorable quotes, Kenneth Downs
• are sql shortcuts a good practice ?, gabriel
  • Re: are sql shortcuts a good practice ?, Marshall Spight
    • Re: are sql shortcuts a good practice ?, Misha Dorman
• Migrating data from a non normalized source like excel to a well designed Database, Hi5
• Object-Role Modeling?, Dan
  • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Mikito Harakiri
    • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Ken North
      • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Dan
      • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, -CELKO-
      • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Dan
  • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Jan Hidders
    • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Dan
      • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, William D. Bartholomew
      • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Alfredo Novoa
  • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Alfredo Novoa
    • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Kenneth Downs
      • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, David Cressey
  • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Kenneth Downs
    • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Object-Role Modeling?, Kenneth Downs
• source for RM research, falcon
  • Re: source for RM research, -CELKO-
    • Re: source for RM research, falcon
      • Re: source for RM research, Ach C via DBMonster.com
  • Re: source for RM research, Marshall Spight
• Base Normal Form, David Cressey
  • Re: Base Normal Form, Jan Hidders
    • Re: Base Normal Form, David Cressey
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Jon Heggland
  • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
    • Re: Base Normal Form, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, mAsterdam
      • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, mAsterdam
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Base Normal Form, mAsterdam
      • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Eric Junkermann
      • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Eric Junkermann
      • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Marshall Spight
      • Functions are not fundamental to databases. Realtion are., Drago Ganic
      • Re: Functions are not fundamental to databases. Realtion are., dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Marshall Spight
      • Re: Base Normal Form, David Cressey
      • Re: Base Normal Form, dawn
      • Re: Base Normal Form, mAsterdam
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Kenneth Downs
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Base Normal Form, David Cressey
      • Re: Base Normal Form, mAsterdam
      • Re: Base Normal Form, Jan Hidders
      • cdt glossary - TABLE (was: Base Normal Form), mAsterdam
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, Jan Hidders
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, mAsterdam
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, Jan Hidders
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, Marshall Spight
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, David Cressey
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, Jan Hidders
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, Paul
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, mAsterdam
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, Paul
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, mAsterdam
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, Marshall Spight
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, dawn
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, Paul
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, mAsterdam
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, Jan Hidders
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, Paul
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, Jan Hidders
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE (was: Base Normal Form), David Cressey
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE (was: Base Normal Form), dawn
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, mAsterdam
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, dawn
      • Re: cdt glossary - TABLE, mAsterdam
      • cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form), mAsterdam
      • Re: cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form), David Cressey
      • Re: cdt glossary TABLE, mAsterdam
      • Re: cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form), Kenneth Downs
      • Re: cdt glossary TABLE, mAsterdam
      • Re: cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form), dawn
      • Re: cdt glossary TABLE, mAsterdam
• Intermediate Relational/Set Theory Text, William D. Bartholomew
• Sub-Entities, wbarthol
  • Re: Sub-Entities, Jon Heggland
  • Re: Sub-Entities, Neo
  • Re: Sub-Entities, -CELKO-
    • Re: Sub-Entities, William D. Bartholomew
      • Re: Sub-Entities, -CELKO-
      • Re: Sub-Entities, William D. Bartholomew
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sub-Entities, Gene Wirchenko
• Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying?, Dan
  • Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying?, Dan
  • Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying?, Jan Hidders
    • Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying?, Dan
      • Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying?, Dan
      • Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying?, Jan Hidders
• Eliminating Nulls, wbarthol
  • Re: Eliminating Nulls, John
    • Re: Eliminating Nulls, Mark D Powell
      • Re: Eliminating Nulls, AK
      • Re: Eliminating Nulls, Mark D Powell
      • Re: Eliminating Nulls, Mark D Powell
      • Re: Eliminating Nulls, John
      • Re: Eliminating Nulls, -CELKO-
      • Re: Eliminating Nulls, paul c
      • Re: Eliminating Nulls, Mark D Powell
      • Re: Eliminating Nulls, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Eliminating Nulls, Mark D Powell
  • Re: Eliminating Nulls, -CELKO-
    • Re: Eliminating Nulls, wbarthol
  • Re: Eliminating Nulls, Neo
• A good argument for XML, arthernan
  • Re: A good argument for XML, Gene Wirchenko
    • Re: A good argument for XML, arthernan
    • Re: A good argument for XML, Tom Bradford
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Tom Bradford
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Marshall Spight
      • Re: A good argument for XML, arthernan
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Marshall Spight
  • Re: A good argument for XML, Jan Hidders
    • Re: A good argument for XML, arthernan
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Jan Hidders
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Jan Hidders
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: A good argument for XML, dawn
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Jan Hidders
      • Re: A good argument for XML, arthernan
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: A good argument for XML, arthernan
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: A good argument for XML, arthernan
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: A good argument for XML, arthernan
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Lauri
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Marshall Spight
      • Re: A good argument for XML, arthernan
      • Re: A good argument for XML, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: A good argument for XML, arthernan
• Testing for the equivalence relation, Dan
  • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, Mikito Harakiri
    • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, Dan
  • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, Jan Hidders
    • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, Dan
      • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, Dan
      • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, Dan Guntermann
      • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, Dan Guntermann
      • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, VC
      • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, Dan Guntermann
      • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, VC
      • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, Dan
      • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, VC
      • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, Dan Guntermann
      • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, VC
      • Re: Testing for the equivalence relation, Dan Guntermann
• Normalisation, Patsybulo
  • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
    • Re: Normalisation, Patsybulo
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Dan Guntermann
      • Re: Normalisation, Patsybulo
      • Re: Normalisation, Dan Guntermann
      • Re: Normalisation, Patsybulo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Normalisation, Patsybulo
    • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Patsybulo
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Paul
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Paul
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jonathan Leffler
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Paul
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Alfredo Novoa
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, paul c
      • Re: Normalisation, Paul
      • Re: Normalisation, paul c
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Computational complexity (was Re: Normalisation), Misha Dorman
      • Re: Computational complexity (was Re: Normalisation), Marshall Spight
      • Re: Computational complexity (was Re: Normalisation), Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Paul
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
      • A, Jan Hidders
      • OT Re: A, mAsterdam
      • Re: A, Paul
      • Re: A, Jan Hidders
      • Re: A, Paul
      • Re: A, vc
      • Re: A, Paul
      • Re: A, vc
      • Re: A, Jon Heggland
      • Message not available
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Normalisation, Jan Hidders
      • Re: Normalisation, Jon Heggland
• Simple Example, How To Model It In RM, Neo
  • Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM, Tony Andrews
    • Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM, Neo
      • Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM, Tony Andrews
      • Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM, Neo
      • Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM, Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
      • Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM, Neo
  • Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM, John
    • Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM, Gene Wirchenko
• Designing a language database - issues?, Paul
  • Re: Designing a language database - issues?, Neo
    • Re: Designing a language database - issues?, Paul
      • Re: Designing a language database - issues?, Bruce Baker
      • Re: Designing a language database - issues?, Neo
      • Re: Designing a language database - issues?, Paul
      • Re: Designing a language database - issues?, Bruce Baker
  • Message not available
    • Re: Designing a language database - issues?, Paul
  • Re: Designing a language database - issues?, Gene Wirchenko
    • Re: Designing a language database - issues?, Marshall Spight
• Counting links between to records on the same table (Clustering?), Dale Walker
  • Re: Counting links between to records on the same table (Clustering?), paul c
    • Re: Counting links between to records on the same table (Clustering?), Dale Walker
      • Re: Counting links between to records on the same table (Clustering?), paul c
  • Re: Counting links between to records on the same table (Clustering?), Alexandr Savinov
• What to call this operator?, Marshall Spight
  • Re: What to call this operator?, paul c
  • Re: What to call this operator?, David Cressey
    • Re: What to call this operator?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: What to call this operator?, David Cressey
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Marshall Spight
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Vadim Tropashko
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Marshall Spight
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Marshall Spight
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jan Hidders
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Marshall Spight
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jan Hidders
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Marshall Spight
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Vadim Tropashko
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Vadim Tropashko
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Vadim Tropashko
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Marshall Spight
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Vadim Tropashko
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jon Heggland
  • Re: What to call this operator?, Mikito Harakiri
    • Re: What to call this operator?, Marshall Spight
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: What to call this operator?, paul c
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: What to call this operator?, paul c
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: What to call this operator?, paul c
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: What to call this operator?, paul c
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Jon Heggland
      • Re: What to call this operator?, Mikito Harakiri
• the RM and Godel, mountain man
  • Re: the RM and Godel, Jan Hidders
    • Re: the RM and Godel, mountain man
  • Re: the RM and Godel, Dan
• Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Stefan Rybacki
  • Message not available
    • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Stefan Rybacki
  • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Jan Hidders
    • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Stefan Rybacki
    • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), mAsterdam
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Stefan Rybacki
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), mAsterdam
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), mAsterdam
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Stefan Rybacki
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Stefan Rybacki
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), mAsterdam
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Dan Guntermann
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Stefan Rybacki
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Dan Guntermann
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Stefan Rybacki
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Dan Guntermann
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Stefan Rybacki
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), mAsterdam
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Dan Guntermann
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), mAsterdam
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Dan Guntermann
      • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), mAsterdam
      • Tree constraint in the adjacency graph model, Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: Tree constraint in the adjacency graph model, mAsterdam
      • Re: Tree constraint in the adjacency graph model, Stefan Rybacki
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Mikito Harakiri
  • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Neo
  • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Dan Guntermann
    • Re: SQL, related records (quotes), Timpea
• Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?, Dan
  • Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?, Jan Hidders
    • Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?, mountain man
    • Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?, Dan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?, mountain man
    • Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?, Jon Heggland
    • Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?, lauri . pietarinen
  • Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?, mountain man
  • Re: Poll: What percentage advantage are RDBMS vendors taking of the RM?, mountain man
• Re: query to trace all parents, Stefan Rybacki
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: query to trace all parents, Stefan Rybacki
• Dirty data (was: Newbie question), mAsterdam
• Re: the distinction between data and intelligence, mountain man
  • Re: the distinction between data and intelligence, Kenneth Downs
    • Re: the distinction between data and intelligence, mountain man
      • Re: the distinction between data and intelligence, Kenneth Downs
      • Re: the distinction between data and intelligence, mountain man
      • Re: the distinction between data and intelligence, Kenneth Downs
      • Re: the distinction between data and intelligence, mountain man
      • Re: the distinction between data and intelligence, Kenneth Downs
• Re: Newbie question, Jon Heggland
  • Re: Newbie question, Bernard Peek
    • Re: Newbie question, Jon Heggland
      • Re: Newbie question, Bernard Peek
      • Re: Newbie question, Jon Heggland
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Newbie question, Paul
    • Re: Newbie question, Kenneth Downs
• Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], David Cressey
    • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
  • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
    • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Dan
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
    • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jonathan Leffler
    • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Alexandr Savinov
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Alexandr Savinov
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], David Cressey
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], David Cressey
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], mike
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], mike
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], VC
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], VC
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], vc
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], VC
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], vc
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], vc
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], vc
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], VC
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], vc
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], vc
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], vc
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Gene Wirchenko
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Mikito Harakiri
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], vc
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jon Heggland
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], DM Unseen
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], paul c
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], paul c
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], paul c
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Alexandr Savinov
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], lauri . pietarinen
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], lauri . pietarinen
  • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
    • Message not available
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
  • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
    • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], VC
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Jan Hidders
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], vc
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], VC
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], Marshall Spight
      • Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens], vc

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint