Memory Resident TempDB was Re: OK, lets be serious



Hello, Bret --

On Apr 8, 8:47 pm, b...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

I believe we are also looking at ways to make tempdb(s)
purely memory-resident with no need for disks at all - but the feature
isn't here yet.

-bret

Somebody told me you could set up a ram-disk, and mount the tempdb on
it.

I tried it without much success. But then, they never told me how it
was supposed to be accomplished.

Someone else told me you could simply install a lot of memory, then
make a very large cache, then assign said large cache to the tempdb.
It's not really a "ramdisk", but Sybase should keep things in the
cache until it's necessary to save it to disk. If the cache is as
large as tempdb, that need will be very rare. This is supposed to
have similar performance to a ramdisk.

I've tried this, and it appears to work, although I haven't
benchmarked it.

Comments?
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: RAID - config Question
    ... SQL Server does not need read cache on the controller since it does it's own ... Since you are doing so much tempdb and log activity you want to make ... >> for the data files or take one or two for tempdb and the others for the ... >>> If I create 2 seperate Volumes, Each volume would have 3 disks. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)
  • Re: Tips sought for optimizing 10.4.10s performance
    ... upgrade to disks with those speeds. ... Most desktop drives have been 7200 RPM, ... 7200 RPM disks have only had 2MB of cache. ... a CPU upgrade, or do I just get a new Mac. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.system)
  • Re: Tips sought for optimizing 10.4.10s performance
    ... If you're doing graphics or video editing, even more RAM. ... upgrade to disks with those speeds. ... 7200 RPM disks have only had 2MB of cache. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.system)
  • Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?
    ... >> write cache enabled. ... > Unfortunately, IDE disks do not permit disconnected writes, due ... Unfortunately SCSI drives all seem to ship with the WCE bit set, ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • RE: Write Caching
    ... If Node loses both paths to the disks I would venture to say you would see ... Your data in cache is still safe because it is held on the storage ... I have seen FTDISK events being reported even for SAN volumes. ... >> the NODES Raid Controller cards has no way to update. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering)