ASA9 and multiple databases: best practise?
- From: Claus Scherschel <claus.scherschel@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:04:48 +0200
Hi folks,
I'm trying to find out the best practise when running multiple
databases. Most people seem to use the one-engine-multiple-databases
solution. I understand this to be best practise mainly for manageability
reasons. Sometimes a better efficieny in memory usage is thrown into
discussion - without giving any technical details. Could this be even a
question of licensing?
I would like to read your opinion on that topic. Maybe you have
knowledge of some white papers or usenet threads (I didn't find)
discussing that?
Kind regards from Bonn,
Claus Scherschel.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ASA9 and multiple databases: best practise?
- From: Ant Zucaro
- Re: ASA9 and multiple databases: best practise?
- Prev by Date: Re: Sybase Database
- Next by Date: insert output of procedure into temp table
- Previous by thread: Problem converting table self reference from TransactSQL to ANSI SQL
- Next by thread: Re: ASA9 and multiple databases: best practise?
- Index(es):