Re: encrypting stored procedure
- From: "Ant Zucaro" <azucaro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Aug 2006 07:24:15 -0700
Mikhail has a good point.
Oftentimes it isn't worth the effort because if people *really* want to
de-compile they can. This thread reminded me of a similar one on the
Postgresql group that I read just a few weeks ago when I was looking
into the same type of issue. It is here:
http://groups.google.com/group/pgsql.admin/browse_thread/thread/e3ce5f60bca28bae/a8211a22774b0f88?lnk=gst&q=stored+procedure&rnum=7#a8211a22774b0f88
-Ant
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
julien Touche wrote:
sp_hidetext <ProcName>
How strong is this "encryption"? Java byte-code, for example, can be
decompiled back easily -- and often ends up looking better, than the
original :-)
-mi
.
- References:
- encrypting stored procedure
- From: r . randhawa
- Re: encrypting stored procedure
- From: julien Touche
- Re: encrypting stored procedure
- From: Mikhail Teterin
- encrypting stored procedure
- Prev by Date: Re: sqsh and right trimming of columns
- Next by Date: Re: BCp issue with ignore_dup_key
- Previous by thread: Re: encrypting stored procedure
- Next by thread: Re: encrypting stored procedure
- Index(es):