Re: Sybase and materialized views
- From: Galen Boyer <galen_boyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Dec 2005 18:02:02 -0600
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, kristiandamm@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> If on the other hand, the view is based on a number of other tables,
> each of may have data inserted and updated independently, I would be
> more wary of such an undertaking. The complexity of the maintenance
> could be great indeed, even without considering problems with
> multithreaded updating: syncronisation, locking, etc.
Multiple tables aren't an issue with Oracle for Materialized Views.
--
Galen Boyer
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sybase and materialized views
- From: Kristian Damm Jensen
- Re: Sybase and materialized views
- References:
- Sybase and materialized views
- From: supergel
- Re: Sybase and materialized views
- From: DA Morgan
- Re: Sybase and materialized views
- From: Carl Kayser
- Re: Sybase and materialized views
- From: Galen Boyer
- Re: Sybase and materialized views
- From: sybdba
- Re: Sybase and materialized views
- From: Galen Boyer
- Re: Sybase and materialized views
- From: Kristian Damm Jensen
- Sybase and materialized views
- Prev by Date: Version Confusion
- Next by Date: Sybase error -5702 and -1
- Previous by thread: Re: Sybase and materialized views
- Next by thread: Re: Sybase and materialized views
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|