Re: Please Help


I normally avoid recruiting posts, but I just have to state a few
things in this case.

On May 29, 9:31 am, La <lgood...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gentlemen,

This position is available to work remotely for the right candidate-
so no move is necessary. The irony of an MV guy not wanting to work in
cubes, by the way, makes me chuckle. But you would be free-range in
this position anyway. Perhaps that makes it a bit more worthy of
follow up for some of you. One of you? Forget the acronyms.


How can someone work remotely and be innovative with a business
they never see and/or participate in personally.

 And I was directed to this site with fair warning about who usually
posts- but also that it was probably the most experienced and
knowledgeable congregation of MV professionals I would be able to
reach. I agree it has been fun. Fun and informative.


I'm not sure I'd go that far. CDP is a decent sampling of the MV
community but it's far from "the most experienced and knowledgeable
congregation of MV professionals." There are many top-notch gearheads
that don't have anything to do with CDP for various reasons. Stop by
the OpenQM group and the U2-Users list on your way around the block.
Also, give www.intl-spectrum.com a scan. There's plenty of webinar
presenters and tech article submitters to browse through. www.pickjobs.net
is also a good resource to review. I have my own "fellow geek list"
from the community, but times have changed and many of them have moved
on to 'greener pastures' or changed careers completely. All I can
suggest to you is to spell out precisely what you have with regards to
MV software and integrated components. You should also state what you
expect the developer to be able to do immediately and also additional
things with some paid training if needed. The reason I say that is
that most of the developers I know with the skills to do it all right
now are already part of a successful development firm, or a stand-
alone VAR that won't do full-time, or a well-paid in-house developer
with no incentive to rip up roots. There is the occasional floater,
but you have to be diligent in your search and also be willing to
compromise on any facet of the job requirements.

"Before I built a wall I'd ask to know, what I was walling in or
walling out, and whom I was like to give offense"- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'm still a bit confused about what anyone would actually be
doing. :) It sounds similar to what I've been doing for the past 11
years @ All-Spec, but potentially in a different industry.

Regards,

GlenB / mvdevcentral.com
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DropDownList advice needed
    ... Thanks, Peter and Kevin. ... reasons you both pointed out. ... because they say if me and another developer leave, ... >I hope someone in the Classic ASP newsgroup pointed out to you that 10,000 ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Why Turbo Delphi for win32 need .NET SDK?
    ... disappointed because Turbo Delphi had .NET pre-requisites, ... An experienced developer might be thinking this way. ... I guess given that the reasons given for why it _cannot_ be removed are ... For the record - I currently cannot install Turbo Delphi.32 because I ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Linux v2.6.27-rc1
    ... That may not sound like much, but it's enough to make me worry about ... developer that just has a few patches pending as it works for subsystem ... because for the above two reasons I do not think it can really work that ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Please Help
    ... community but it's far from "the most experienced and knowledgeable ... that don't have anything to do with CDP for various reasons. ... or a well-paid in-house developer with no incentive to rip ... In response to various other posts I reached out to my client today to ...
    (comp.databases.pick)
  • Re: TRICK: methods in ASPX pages with <%%> code blocks
    ... developer, adopt best practices. ... experiences, and by observing the experiences of others, over a long period ... >I don't have solid "evidence" of coding one way or the other. ... but your reasons for not doing just don't make sense to me. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)