Re: D3/Linux compile question
- From: x <lucian_pata@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:46:31 -0800 (PST)
Frosty, "This, from the gentlemen who just argued that zero is a
counting number? " not me, wrong gentlemen ;-)
To go to the original question, as Chandru already mentioned, ARRAY(0)
came to light in the context of how to handle best the oversize
situation when you do a MATPARSE. You either discard it, stick it in
the last element of the dimensioned array or save it in a new variable
which, for the sake of simplicity, you call it ARRAY(0).
I prefer the later approach but that's just a mater of personal taste.
Lucian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: D3/Linux compile question
- From: x
- Re: D3/Linux compile question
- From: x
- Re: D3/Linux compile question
- References:
- D3/Linux compile question
- From: Dale
- Re: D3/Linux compile question
- From: Tony Gravagno
- Re: D3/Linux compile question
- From: Mike Preece
- Re: D3/Linux compile question
- From: Chandru Murthi
- Re: D3/Linux compile question
- From: frosty
- Re: D3/Linux compile question
- From: x
- Re: D3/Linux compile question
- From: frosty
- D3/Linux compile question
- Prev by Date: Re: Cross-platform development
- Next by Date: Re: D3/Linux compile question
- Previous by thread: Re: D3/Linux compile question
- Next by thread: Re: D3/Linux compile question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|