Re: DIM vs. Dynamic
- From: Jim Idle <jimi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:08:16 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 29, 1:45 pm, "frosty" <fros...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
IAWTP. Write dynamic, optimize to dimension if/when
necessary. In my experience, optimization w/DIM is
not necessary 99% of the time. Also there are other
advantages to dynamic; REMOVE/SETTING springs to mind.
REMOVE was a dumb idea, the pointers shodl have been cached
in the variable descriptor automatically. REMOVE is actually slower
than pointer caching, but if you don;t have pointer caching on your
implementation, then REMOVE it must be.
Jim
.
- References:
- DIM vs. Dynamic
- From: jeffk75067
- Re: DIM vs. Dynamic
- From: frosty
- DIM vs. Dynamic
- Prev by Date: Re: DIM vs. Dynamic
- Next by Date: Re: DIM vs. Dynamic
- Previous by thread: Re: DIM vs. Dynamic
- Next by thread: Re: DIM vs. Dynamic
- Index(es):