Re: Looking for info on abandoned conversion to SQL
- From: Ross Ferris <rossf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 04:44:36 -0700
On Aug 31, 3:43 pm, "Lee Bacall" <moley...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Curt,
Here's a start...http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-4996257/Reynolds-tries-to-ret...
http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2005/jul/1165654.htm
There was probably another 20+ million written off by Reynolds and Reynolds
in addition to the 67
million according to some rumors I've heard.
--
Lee Bacall
binarystar.com
NuWiki.com - Collaborative Information Management
"Curt" <Nob...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.213b400e5a77ebfd989728@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Somewhere I read a story about a major software house that was trying to
convert away from an MV solution to SQL and spent like 12 million
dollars trying and then abandoned it. Can someone point me to that story
please. Thanks- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
closer to 30 if you read the fine print
.
- References:
- Looking for info on abandoned conversion to SQL
- From: Curt
- Re: Looking for info on abandoned conversion to SQL
- From: Lee Bacall
- Looking for info on abandoned conversion to SQL
- Prev by Date: Re: D3 Background process - new linux
- Next by Date: group locks
- Previous by thread: Re: Looking for info on abandoned conversion to SQL
- Next by thread: Is anyone using CDP (Continuous Data Protection) with D3/NT?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|