Re: A new twist on the last problem (D3/NT)

Mike Preece wrote:

Yes, you're right of course. Still - it would have been better/best to
have used subrouine call, as you said. I feel a tinge of guilt when I
say this, but I actually used to pride myself on my ability with
f-correlatives.

Yeah, me too. Utterly disdained the use of A-correlatives too. I could be such a snot. The more difficult it was, the more worthwhile. I don't know when that changed, but I guess I must have mellowed somewhere along the line.

> Some - no kidding - went on for over a screen-full.

Yikes! You win!

Since the introduction of the CALL from dictionary items I've turned my
back on all of that. It ain't worth the agro.

I try my best to avoid the need for BASIC calls, AND for complex correlatives. Decent database design really helps there, but of course we don't always get a say in that.

Cheers,
Luke
.