Re: A new twist on the last problem (D3/NT)


dzigray wrote:
Alberto's solution seemed as if it would work and was a lot simpler.
absolutely, however, alberto noted the failure condition of an
ALL-ALPHA condition... the F-Correlative i supplied handled such.


Yes, you're right of course. Still - it would have been better/best to
have used subrouine call, as you said. I feel a tinge of guilt when I
say this, but I actually used to pride myself on my ability with
f-correlatives. Some - no kidding - went on for over a screen-full.
Since the introduction of the CALL from dictionary items I've turned my
back on all of that. It ain't worth the agro.

Cheers,
Mike.

And... umm... I think, if you check... Your correlative is working on
attribute 1 - not 0.
ahhh... you got me! my test data was done using attribute 1 -- good
catch.

.