Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?

murthi wrote:

The sad thing about discussions like these is that there will most
probably never be a sea change in Pick/mvBasic/ etc to incorporate *some*
(we can disagree as to which *some*) new features.
Perhaps QMBasic is a good
compromise?


D3 is doing something on OO as well, so hopefully there *is* a sea
change but its too much in its infancy to help us I am afraid.

Cheers,
Steve Bush
NEOSYS

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Probably The Most Important Election Of Our Time
    ... the GOP is being "obstructionist" because they dare to disagree with ... filibuster as a matter of daily routine. ... Okay, let's compromise, let me burn down half your house. ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: sub $500 automobile GPS?
    ... strike a good compromise between features and price. ... newsgroups and done some online research, so i am basically just asking ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)
  • Re: sub $500 automobile GPS?
    ... strike a good compromise between features and price. ... newsgroups and done some online research, so i am basically just asking ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)
  • Re: Sad
    ... I disagree. ... There are some good features in XP and win2k is Slooooow. ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: 2.6.36/37 suggestion
    ... suggest kernel developers (first of all, Linus) some kind of ... compromise. ... trying to forbid new features in mainline is ultimately self-defeating. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)