Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- From: "GVP" <gvp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Jun 2006 19:17:02 -0700
OOP just in Our minds. Languages just help us to write bad or good
programs.
We can write OOP application using any language. (In addition, using
OOP language cannot write good application). Class just is structure
with constructor and destructor, member function - just simple
functions with hidden THIS. Private, public, protected - needs only for
programmer. Overload just help easy create new version of code and code
reusing.
Try to recall, how many members and operators were overloaded.
Three years ago, I wrote OOP package for PickBasic and understood that
it is not need in real work.
There are three groups of applications:
1 Server application (good if OOP present on server only for UI)
2 Server-client application (most do by server, client only GUI, don't
need OOP on server)
3 Client-server applications (most do by PC)
Abstract. Attributes in Pick is class members. DICT is class
definition. Just not present useful bridges between DICT and PickBasic
and PC.
I think that:
- OOP client for complex GUI.
- PickBasic for low level data management.
Sorry for my bad English.
Regards,
Grigory
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- From: Symeon
- Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- References:
- OO BASIC or "B++"?
- From: SteveB
- Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- From: Symeon
- Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- From: Anthony Lauder
- Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- From: Anthony Lauder
- Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- From: Symeon
- Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- From: Anthony Lauder
- Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- From: murthi
- Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- From: Anthony Lauder
- Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- From: murthi
- Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- From: Lucian
- OO BASIC or "B++"?
- Prev by Date: Re: Browser as Platform (was DesignBais - Impressive)
- Next by Date: Re: Browser as Platform (was DesignBais - Impressive)
- Previous by thread: Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- Next by thread: Re: OO BASIC or "B++"?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|