Re: Visage, DesignBAIS...
- From: "Glen B" <no$pamwebmaster@no$pamforallspec.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:58:29 -0500
At some point later this year I'll probably take a look. I'm really
.NET and MS ignorant, however. I'm also a big fan of developer
libraries and not much of a fan of generated code, so I'm curious which
approach you take. Cheers! --dawn
Why don't you like generated code? And, what level of generated code is
considered bad? I consider three levels:
1) Options drive complete code generation based on a set of pre-written
code+logic algorithms.
2) Prewritten routines are put together, along with parametric code+logic
algorithms to glue them together.
3) A utility takes parameters from the user source and modifies the output
source to fit a specific outcome. I.E. a pre-compiler
Glen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Visage, DesignBAIS...
- From: dawn
- Re: Visage, DesignBAIS...
- References:
- Visage, DesignBAIS...
- From: dawn
- Re: Visage, DesignBAIS...
- From: Mike Preece
- Re: Visage, DesignBAIS...
- From: Ross Ferris
- Re: Visage, DesignBAIS...
- From: DaveinBoston
- Re: Visage, DesignBAIS...
- From: dawn
- Visage, DesignBAIS...
- Prev by Date: Re: Visage, DesignBAIS...
- Next by Date: Re: Visage, DesignBAIS...
- Previous by thread: Re: Visage, DesignBAIS...
- Next by thread: Re: Visage, DesignBAIS...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|