Re: Mentor-Pro
- From: "Simon Verona" <nomail@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:28:15 -0000
I know that Univision was a "white-room" development - ie didn't use any
external source code - but that it was functionally based on the ADDS MOE of
the time.
ADDS people may have been involved (I think EDP recruited some ADDS staff at
the time - though I may be wrong), but I can't see why ADDS would have
corroborated in a project that would lose them future revenues... Again, I
could be wrong.
I doubt you'll get a comment from anybody in EDP... but we can hope :)
Simon
<csigline@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1138367625.214539.301880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Obviously, not having to buy licenses was one of the motivators but I
> am quite sure that ADDS and/or the high-ups at ADDS were deeply
> involved in this.
>
> So can anyone from EDP speak up; Does UniVision have the "linking
> loader" that Frosty ssays is one of the distinguishing features
> between R83 and OA?
>
> Henry Keultjes
> hbkeultjesatearthlinkdotnet
>
.
- References:
- Mentor-Pro
- From: csigline
- Re: Mentor-Pro
- From: Simon Verona
- Re: Mentor-Pro
- From: csigline
- Mentor-Pro
- Prev by Date: Re: Mentor-Pro
- Next by Date: Re: Abbreviation List Tables Design, aka OTLT
- Previous by thread: Re: Mentor-Pro
- Next by thread: Re: Mentor-Pro
- Index(es):