Re: jdbc icc connection cache
- From: "news.verizon.net" <kennedyii@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 23:39:17 GMT
<kuassi.mensah@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d138c3d8-4c4d-48bc-a618-284376deb856@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On May 22, 8:34 pm, "news.verizon.net" <kenned...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I don't have the metalink doc id with me, but when our other dba was
<kuassi.men...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eb45f9a5-352a-447c-b48e-91a394027397@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On May 21, 2:20 pm, "jim. dot scuba dot kennedy at gee male dot com"
<jim.scuba.kenn...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does anyone have any experience using Oracle's JDBC ICC (implicit
connections cache) with RAC? We are on 10G. What I am looking for is
if anyone is using this and their overall experience. Good bad, etc.
Thanks,
Jim Kennedy
Hi,
I am the Oracle JDBC product manager, not a customer.
I don't have permission to give names but there are happy customers
using ICC with RAC as well as Fast Connection Failover and Runtime
Connection Load Balancing.
Fwiw, my blog entry
http://db360.blogspot.com/2007/01/is-your-java-application-failoverpr...,
gives a summary of how it works and how to enable it.
Kuassi
- bloghttp://db360.blogspot.com
- bookhttp://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1555583296
-http://www.savedarfur.org/content
Thanks. If you know of any customers that would be willing to provide
feedback to me directly - I would not diseminate the information
elsewhere -
please have them contact me. jimk at snapnames dot com. We have been
struggling with a non-rac related isse with the thin jdbc driver for a
couple of years on a known issue. (create a type in schema A, grant
execute
on type to schema B. Create a synonym in schema B for the type defined
in
schema A. The JDBC thin driver does not handle this case. It turns out
the
11g jdbc driver finally does, but Oracle recommends not using it because
of
a sever memory leak. Subsequently, we have had to write a lot of code to
get around this issue and the QA manager is gun shy with some Oracle
products. Which has lead me to my assignment to get some feedback from
other customers. (not to be made public, to be kept in confidence) The
QA
manager wants to know if anyone actually uses this in production and
wants
to get feed back from them.
I know I have rambled a bit. I have booked marked your site and am
keeping
a copy of your reply for reference.
Thanks,
Jim Kennedy
Jim,
Will do.
There is no known memory leak with 11g JDBC-Thin; The recommendation
is to use full/complete schema name instead of synonym becoz it takes
a couple of round trips to get the complete information from the
server.
Kuassi
researching using the 11G jdbc thin driver he came across the doc. on it.
(we are using 10G as the server not 11G as the server) (short on details,
it was related to an SR with a creation date of around the end of April).
When he asked the Oracle support person about it they recommended to NOT use
the 11g jdbc thin driver because of a known memory leak.(maybe there isn't
maybe there is)
You have to add the schema in front of the type because it doesn't work if
you don't. It is a bug that has been there at lease pre 11G JDBC driver. (I
think we did confirm that it was fixed in 11G) Yes, it may be faster during
the describe to have the schema prefixed to the object type, but it should
not be required. It is not required if I do it from a tool like sqlplus for
example. (assuming proper rights and synonym creation etc.) I know this is
going to sound silly, but it would be a major code rewrite to change all the
Java objects to use an schema prefix (for a schema other than the one they
are connecting to.) Management does not want to spend the large cost to
rewrite and retest to accomadate the schema prefix when the question is "Why
doesn't Oracle fix something that should work?" (This is a known issue.)
Not trying to bitch ; just giving you customer feed back because I think it
would be helpful to Oracle. I do like the product and have had excellent
experiences with it. I have used the db since version 6 and have had some
very positive customer support experiences.
Thanks,
Jim Kennedy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: jdbc icc connection cache
- From: kuassi.mensah@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: jdbc icc connection cache
- References:
- jdbc icc connection cache
- From: jim. dot scuba dot kennedy at gee male dot com
- Re: jdbc icc connection cache
- From: kuassi.mensah@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: jdbc icc connection cache
- From: news.verizon.net
- Re: jdbc icc connection cache
- From: kuassi.mensah@xxxxxxxxx
- jdbc icc connection cache
- Prev by Date: sounds like 11.2 will be out before the end of 2008 calendar year
- Next by Date: Re: Results from Oracle function in cache (10g) ?
- Previous by thread: Re: jdbc icc connection cache
- Next by thread: Re: jdbc icc connection cache
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|