Re: Best fs for Oracle RAC
- From: gerryt <lepsysinc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:26:02 -0700
On Sep 21, 4:57 pm, Steve Howard <stevedhow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 20, 1:26 pm, Andrea <pincopa...@xxxxx> wrote:
Hi,We've had great luck with ASM on both clustered and standalone
we have been to value some types of Oracle RAC solutions in according to
which filesystem to use on SAN in cluster environment with HP-UX (or
Linux) platform.
HP says that there are this options to choose (in order of
importance):
raw device
oracle ASM
OCFS (only for linux)
NFS in high avail.
The our choice incline to ASM, because i think that this avoid problems
with platform compatibility and for easier management of datafiles.
I would like to know if there are some papers that explain these
solutions of filesystem, also they defects.
The products that we have to install are Oracle DB 10g with RAC.
databases, and ironically enough, our sysadmins *love* it.
Nothing ironic about it. Less work for them apart from initial setup
AND performance gains to boot : >
Everybody wins. n.b. a much reviled SA type myself...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Best fs for Oracle RAC
- From: Andrea
- Re: Best fs for Oracle RAC
- References:
- Best fs for Oracle RAC
- From: Andrea
- Re: Best fs for Oracle RAC
- From: Steve Howard
- Best fs for Oracle RAC
- Prev by Date: Re: Cache Hit Ratio from system views
- Next by Date: Re: Best fs for Oracle RAC
- Previous by thread: Re: Best fs for Oracle RAC
- Next by thread: Re: Best fs for Oracle RAC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
