Re: Oracle 10g TAF Vs FAN
- From: DA Morgan <damorgan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:20:09 -0700
Ravip via DBMonster.com wrote:
My scenario is, I have a application server in between the front end and
database. During the service configuration the TNSNAMES.ORA is rightly
mentioned with the parameters that is mentioned in URL that you mentioned.
I have 2 node cluster and as of now only 1 of the node is having the full
load. I'm using Webspere as the middle tier. There are some occassions where
only 1 node in the RAC was fully loaded and the CPU reached 100% and
continued for 3-4 minutes, then it came down. Obvious reason for the load is
bad queries and some of them has been rectified.
But my doubt is, if the load balance is enabled or working fine, during the
100% CPU usage of Node 1, the load has to be distribute to the 2nd node -
right ? But it doesn't happen and at that time the 2 node load was just 2%.
To make this work load evenly distributed between 2 nodes, what configuration
should I check and change ?
Thank You.
DA Morgan wrote:[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]Hi,
I have configured the services based on TAF policy. The first node isYou really need to read the documentation. TAF has absolutely nothing to
preferable and the second node is available.
do with listener load balancing.
If you configure your TNSNAMES.ORA properly the nodes will load balance
themselves.
http://www.psoug.org/reference/rac.html
Look at the TNSNAMES.ORA
People read from top to bottom. Please do not top post or you will be
ignored by most. Scroll to the bottom to reply.
You wrote:
" I have 2 node cluster and as of now only 1 of the node is having the full load."
Which is a clear indication that while you may or may not have a RAC
cluster you definitely do not have it configured properly. Post your
tnsnames.ora file. Also validate that your login is to the service
and not to an instance.
Take a look at this page again:
http://www.psoug.org/reference/rac.html
Scroll down to the listing:
"TNSNAMES.ORA 10.2.0.1 RedHat Linux AS 4 U2"
Note that the same cluster can addressed as:
TSTA.TAF ... the TAF service
TSTA
TSTA1
TSTA2
etc.
Each one produces a different behavior.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oracle 10g TAF Vs FAN
- From: Ravip via DBMonster.com
- Re: Oracle 10g TAF Vs FAN
- References:
- Oracle 10g TAF Vs FAN
- From: Ravip via DBMonster.com
- Re: Oracle 10g TAF Vs FAN
- From: DA Morgan
- Re: Oracle 10g TAF Vs FAN
- From: Ravip via DBMonster.com
- Re: Oracle 10g TAF Vs FAN
- From: DA Morgan
- Re: Oracle 10g TAF Vs FAN
- From: Ravip via DBMonster.com
- Oracle 10g TAF Vs FAN
- Prev by Date: Re: Oracle 8 on Aix 5.3 - ISO ?
- Next by Date: Re: Oracle 8 on Aix 5.3 - ISO ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Oracle 10g TAF Vs FAN
- Next by thread: Re: Oracle 10g TAF Vs FAN
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|