Bouncing Serving

From: "Dereck L. Dietz" <dietzdl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:25:59 -0500

We have an off-site database (10g R2, Win2003 Server) that gets bounced
twice a week on a schedule.

The reason I was told is that our "vendor" (the people taking care of it)
recommended it to "flush junk".

Is there any real reason to bounce a server twice a week to clear memory (or
anything else for that matter) that could/should be handled by having the
database actually configured properly?

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bouncing Serving
  - From: DA Morgan
- Re: Bouncing Serving
  - From: Ana C. Dent
- Re: Bouncing Serving
  - From: Charles Hooper
- Re: Bouncing Serving
  - From: joel garry

Prev by Date: Re: Bouncing Serving
Next by Date: how to find what sql being cached
Previous by thread: Oracle Database 10g R2 RAC Installation On Red Hat Linux Using VMware Server
Next by thread: Re: Bouncing Serving
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Weird spam
... And happens for exactly the same reason you generate your internal bounces - those servers received a reject message. ... There are certainly systems out there where manglement have mandated that Exchange must be used because they like their Outlook calendars, but the system is not up to spec for handling the volume of mail it receives, so a low-cost Unix machine is thrown in the way which may not have all the accept/reject details of the Exchange machine, for example, because the sysadmins are having to operate on a shoe-string and don't have the time to do it. ... Your server delivers to that server. ... It creates a bounce, ...
(uk.misc)
Re: SMTP 500 Error
... For some reason none of us can send to one specific address ... recipient's email server. ... since we bounce all of our Exchange accounts ...
(microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
Post cannot be delivered to .ee
... We have Exchange 2003 Server. ... For some reason we cannot send messages to .ee domains. ... Here is a bounce ... Only our Exchange has this problem. ...
(microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
Re: Should DCs with DNS point to self first?
... > when you have all locally, by doing so IMO you're wasting server ... > good reason to do so IMO. ... there are far more issues associated with pointing a DC at itself for primary DNS than pointing at something else. ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
Re: Recommended IMAP server
... Is there be any particular reason I should swap? ... pop3 mailboxes and passing it on to the imap server. ... > Trying to strip the HTML mail is quite a bit of a mess. ... tend to be much more attached to email clients. ...
(comp.os.linux.networking)