Re: RAC, user equivalence
- From: Mladen Gogala <mgogala.SPAM-ME@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 23:43:29 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 03 May 2007 23:18:47 +0200, The Boss wrote:
First of all:
I'm not your 'pal', my name is 'Jeroen' as can be seen from my
signature.
You are definitely not my pal, we agree 100%.
Second:
Have you lost your sense of humor?
No, but I am still very selective of what I consider "humor".
Third:
I actually _did_ read your post to the end, even to the very end where
you asked:
<q> WTF is "user equivalence"? </q>
That was a rhetorical question. More precise error message would be
helpful.
Did _you_ read the answers given by Niall and Gopal to the end? Let me
quote the last sentence from Niall's post: <q> That is it is correct
setting up of rcp that you should look at rather than ssh per-se </q>
I actually did. I resolved the problem myself. This particular problem
was not described in the literature, no matter how many attempts of humor
you make.
Have a nice day/night.
I'm a DBA, I live in the twilight zone.
--
http://www.mladen-gogala.com
.
- References:
- RAC, user equivalence
- From: Mladen Gogala
- Re: RAC, user equivalence
- From: The Boss
- Re: RAC, user equivalence
- From: The Boss
- Re: RAC, user equivalence
- From: Mladen Gogala
- Re: RAC, user equivalence
- From: The Boss
- RAC, user equivalence
- Prev by Date: Re: RAC, user equivalence
- Next by Date: Re: RAC, user equivalence
- Previous by thread: Re: RAC, user equivalence
- Next by thread: Re: RAC, user equivalence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|