Re: dbcontrol default ports

On Mar 29, 10:48 am, "hpuxrac" <johnbhur...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 29, 11:18 am, "EdStevens" <quetico_...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Oracle 10.2.0.2 on HP-UX

Two 'supposedly' identical installations of Oracle 10.2.0.2 on
'supposedly' identical servers. Used dbca to gen custom db creation
scripts on one server. Run scripts, everything comes up fine. Copied
same scripts to second server and executed. Everything ran fine, but
we found that the dbcontrol was configured to use a different port.
On the first server it configured itself to use port 5500, while on
the second it is using 1158.

After reading some more docs, I saw that 5500 was the default for 9i,
and it changed to 1158 for 10g. But neither of these boxes ever saw
9i. All's well that ends well, but I'm curious to find what was at
the root of causing the installation to select different ports on the
two different boxes. Can someone point me to the relevant
documentation?

Thanks.

Did you look at the output from the emca logs?

Yes. Interesting. Both showed a series like this:

Feb 9, 2007 11:12:11 AM oracle.sysman.emcp.util.PortManager
markAllUsedPorts
CONFIG: Marking HTTP port: null from /oracle/app/product/10.2.0/oc4j/
j2ee/OC4J_DBConsole

(with entries also for JMS and RMI ports)

But the first box, the one that used port 5500, went on to search for
ports on the same three components at:

Feb 9, 2007 11:12:11 AM oracle.sysman.emcp.util.PortManager
markAllUsedPorts
CONFIG: Marking HTTP port: 1158 from /oracle/app/product/10.2.0/oc4j/
j2ee/OC4J_DBConsole_l2000mig_tst

Note it found 1158. This file did not exist on the second box, the
one that actually used 1158.

Finally, the first box appears to have settled on the ports it would
acutally use:

Feb 9, 2007 11:12:11 AM oracle.sysman.emcp.util.PortManager
getFreePorts
CONFIG: /oracle/app/product/10.2.0:******.********:null:TN:{}:null:
{DBCONTROL_HTTP_PORT=5500, RMI_PORT=5521, JMS_PORT=5541,
AGENT_PORT=3938}

(The asterisks are masking server and domain names)

So it appears that it (the first install) found a config file that
indicated 1158 was in use, so decided to use 5500 instead. I'm now
perusing the first chapter of Enterprise Manager Advanced
Configuration for further information. THanks for the lead.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SBS 2003 - FrontPage 2003 can not connect to site on Internet
    ... I pasted the config /all below and I do not know what you mean by forwarding ... the ports, so maybe we did not do that. ... into the Server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Remoting
    ... Yes to the config. ... The IP's and ports are hard-coded and I have changed them to work on another ... is there a config file for the clients that, ... I try to "connect" to the server. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • SUMMARY: why so many ports open on Solaris
    ... put startup scripts back in. ... why so many ports open on Solaris ... from workstation users through developers to large server environments. ... Solaris does address this to a degree, by having different install ...
    (SunManagers)
  • Re: User authentication vs. Firewall
    ... >>I have only one static IP and I want to NAT some ports ... >>my server so I can access the intranet server from ... if I change the router config of port 80 to ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis)
  • Re: User authentication vs. Firewall
    ... >my server so I can access the intranet server from ... The point is that even when I configured ports ... if I change the router config of port 80 to ... >something else on my router in orther to route some other ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis)