Re: Why does oracle support suck so much?
- From: NetComrade <netcomradeNSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:31:40 -0400
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:12:21 GMT, Mladen Gogala <gogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:22:45 -0400, NetComrade wrote:
Another bug we are apparently hitting (4449644), which has to do with
excessive CPU usage by Oracle Dispatchers, has been fixed in 9.2.0.8,
which unfortunately is not available for AMD Linux yet, but they've
been working on a 'backport' patch for over 3 weeks now. I have
repeatedly tried to escalate this issue today, and all I get in the
TAR is 'escalated with development', which means _nothing_.. I got a
message from another 'duty manager' today, it basically stated the
following:
Patches are notoriously slow for anything. As far as I know, 9.2.0.8
doesn't yet exist, period.
Not sure what you meant here. Exists for solaris, afaik.. maybe even
some versions of linux.
........
We run Oracle 9.2.0.6 on RH4 AMD
we are currently looking for a DBA
remove NSPAM to email
.
- References:
- Why does oracle support suck so much?
- From: NetComrade
- Re: Why does oracle support suck so much?
- From: Mladen Gogala
- Why does oracle support suck so much?
- Prev by Date: Re: what sort of dba can you get for 100K nowdays
- Next by Date: Re: AIX to linux migration
- Previous by thread: Re: Why does oracle support suck so much?
- Next by thread: Re: Why does oracle support suck so much?
- Index(es):