Re: Oracle Personal Edition Sucks!
- From: "Bob Jones" <email@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:07:05 GMT
"JEDIDIAH" <jedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:cimvh3-m5g.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2006-04-23, ianal Vista <ianal_vista@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Bob Jones" <email@xxxxxx> wrote in[deletia]
news:KAC2g.4831$Lm5.2557@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
<xg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1145515759.282256.260060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yup, Oracle may have gotten too carried away with the Java stuff. They
are using it where ever possible. JVM is a problematic, memory
such as exactly where?
"problematic"? such as where & demonstrated by which metrics?
robbing, slow beast we all have to put up with.
Based upon which reproducable and measurable metrics compared to what?
The tendency to leak memory, run amok and consume the resources
of an entire machine. This tended to be the big problem in the last shop
where a JVM based application server was used.
Now Java apps aren't necessarily bad. Oracle just sets a bad example.
Most Oracle GUI tools just encourage me to write more shell scripts
and use sqlplus more.
--
On top of that, Oracle apps use Oracle Java, IBM apps use IBM Java, and some
other apps need Sun Java. Just think of what kind of mess you can run into.
.
- References:
- Oracle Personal Edition Sucks!
- From: xg
- Re: Oracle Personal Edition Sucks!
- From: Bob Jones
- Re: Oracle Personal Edition Sucks!
- From: ianal Vista
- Re: Oracle Personal Edition Sucks!
- From: JEDIDIAH
- Oracle Personal Edition Sucks!
- Prev by Date: Re: AIX to linux migration
- Next by Date: check table lock.
- Previous by thread: Re: Oracle Personal Edition Sucks!
- Next by thread: Re: Oracle Personal Edition Sucks!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|