Re: Temporary tablespaces using tempfile and concurrent insert/update
- From: "Gerry Sinkiewicz" <sinkiege@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:03:20 GMT
"suri" <suriawan@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141083253.938437.247000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
I have two questions (Oracle 9.2.0.7):
- What is the different from a "normal" temporary tablespace and a
temporary tablespace using temp file? I think that every objects
created on temporary tablespace will not generate any redo (except redo
to protect undo), what is then the benefit using tempfile?
tempfiles are not needed for recovery, but datafiles are, even if they are
temporary.
The one exception is the default temporary tablespace tempfile used to
create a locally
managed system tablespace.
- I use locally managed tablespace and have many 5 concurrent insert to
the table. Is there any contention issue? I think freelist management
will not be used anymore if locally managed tablespace is used. Is this
correct?
What noons said is correct.
Thanks,
Suriawan
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: lots of waiting on 'db file parallel write'
- Next by Date: finding ranges and gaps in the range
- Previous by thread: Re: Temporary tablespaces using tempfile and concurrent insert/update
- Next by thread: finding ranges and gaps in the range
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|