Re: Oracle licence question

sets this will be true. But if you compare equals ... Oracle Standard
Edition to SQL Server Enterprise it is not. And even with this
comparison Oracle has a far richer feature set including substantially
greater security and built-in ability to comply with government auditing
regulations.

Thats just complete rubbish, according to....
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/compare-features.mspx
http://www.oracle.com/database/product_editions.html

For a start, Oracle standard has no Business Intelligence; SQL Server has
OLAP, Reporting Services bundled. So, if your company requires any Business
Intelligence (and I've not met one that doesn't) you will need to pay (a
lot) extra.

Secure Application Roles are not included with Oracle Standard, but the
equiv is with SQL Server Standard
Data Encryption is included with SQL Server Standard, it isn't in Oracle
Standard
Advanced Security is not included with Oracle Standard, nor is Label
Security - again, all can be achieved in SQL Server standard.
No messaging
There is a lot more missing too.

So your statement above is just completely wrong and mis-leading.

One last thing - its only licenced for 4 cpu's, that counts a dual core as 2
cpu's; most kit now has processors that are multi-core; SQL Server standard
can be used on 4 physical processors so if they are all dual core then that
8 processors and you pay for only 4!

And then rant you make about the salaries, if you've really been in IT for
36 years then you'll have a better understanding of the market place and
realise people swap platforms, take me; 5 yrs DB2, 6 months Oracle and 13
years SQL Server and out of those 3 Oracle was quite definitely the hardest
to work with (Oracle 7 i think it was).

--
Tony Rogerson
SQL Server MVP
http://sqlserverfaq.com - free video tutorials


"DA Morgan" <damorgan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1140899958.29158@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
joebayer wrote:
Group,

Oracle is so expensive, often time, managers chose SQL server over Oracle
only because of the expense, and it is sad to see all those new projects
go to SQL server group. (Our shop do not do any in house software
development, only vendor application, and all vendor applications support
both Oracle and SQL)

Sorry this is pure nonsense. I've yet to see a single example, in recent
years, of Oracle being more expensive than SQL Server. In fact I think
the exact opposite is true.

Certainly if you compare the two Enterprise Editions because you think
the name on the marketing literature is more important than the feature
sets this will be true. But if you compare equals ... Oracle Standard
Edition to SQL Server Enterprise it is not. And even with this
comparison Oracle has a far richer feature set including substantially
greater security and built-in ability to comply with government auditing
regulations.

I have one question here:

Is it possible for us only to buy Oracle licence without paying for the
annual support?

Yes. I think it is short-sighted but possible.

All I need is accessing metalink website, and my other projects have
already provided such access.

Then why are you even buying another license? Why not just use your
existing licensed database and create another schema?

Thanks for your comments or suggestions as how to make Oracle competitive
in terms of price, what kind of option do I have here?

If you can show me a comparison of equals where Oracle is more
expensive than SQL Server I would be very appreciative.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(replace x with u to respond)


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: IOT, memory and transaction time
    ... easily generate it with DBMS_METADATA.GET_DDL if your verison of Oracle ... were pretty consistent no matter how big the table (this transaction ... FOREIGN KEY (versionNo) REFERENCES T_TRANSACTIONS, ... Oracle provides read consistency and SQL Server ...
    (comp.databases.oracle.misc)
  • Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec
    ... "Writers block readers and readers block writers in SQLServer. ... getting around this fundamental issue and because of it SQL Server ... admitted they can happen in Oracle, I guess Oracle should never been used ... isolation level but you will always disagree because you follow doctorine ...
    (comp.databases.oracle.server)
  • Re: "Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft" (is it a fair comparison?)
    ... "SQL Server code is just more secure than Oracle code." ... "Does Oracle have an equivalent of SDL? ... David Litchfield is one of the most predominant security researchers in the ... SQL Server because there would be no point at all in considering Microsoft's ...
    (Bugtraq)
  • Re: IOT, memory and transaction time
    ... easily generate it with DBMS_METADATA.GET_DDL if your verison of Oracle ... If it was the update statement that references ... FOREIGN KEY (versionNo) REFERENCES T_TRANSACTIONS, ... There are however differences how both products deal with concurrency; in Oracle readers don't get blocked while this may happen in SQL Server. ...
    (comp.databases.oracle.misc)
  • Re: Import problems on Windows Server
    ... XP is fine, so is Vista, like you I use them day in day out, around 12 hours ... a day myself too - laptops and the desktop i'm writing this on. ... I use SQL Server on XP and Vista for writing and demo'ing stuff, ... those are the same problems in the Oracle world. ...
    (comp.databases.oracle.server)