Re: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- From: englishguy2006@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Jan 2006 22:01:39 -0800
It's 25 different single instance databases that are currently on 25
different servers. If these 25 (proof of concept) work out then there
are many more that could follow. These are all legacy applications, a
bit of everything so there's no opportunity to consolidate the
databases without making major application changes. Wish there was but
it's just not possible. Either way it seems to me that they will be
overhead with VMware virtual servers, a database / server (what we have
now) or with RAC. There's always the other option of just loading up a
server with a few database instances and not using VMware but that
makes it difficult for us to move a database from one server to
another. With VMware and Vmotion I'm led to believe that moving a
virtual server from one server to another is very easy.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- From: Jim Kennedy
- Re: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- References:
- Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- From: englishguy2006
- Re: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- From: Jim Kennedy
- Re: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- From: englishguy2006
- Re: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- From: Sybrand Bakker
- Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- Prev by Date: Re: Java to C on win32
- Next by Date: Extents and Segment space management
- Previous by thread: Re: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- Next by thread: Re: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
