Re: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- From: "Jim Kennedy" <jim dot scuba dot kennedy at gee male dot com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:22:56 -0800
<englishguy2006@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1138672949.410075.84670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello,
>
> My company is considering moving some development databases to a new
> hardware platform. There are two proposals under consideration:
>
> a) 5 blade servers, using VMware to create 25 virtual servers with each
> virtual servers running a single instance of Oracle 10g on each.
> b) 5 blade servers with each running 25 instances of a database using
> RAC.
>
> I'd like to find out if anyone has any comments as to which would be
> the most efficient and what they would recommend.
>
> Thanks very much.
>
> Paul
>
B. Why have the overhead of all those virtual servers? (not against VMware
in general)
Jim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- From: englishguy2006
- Re: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- References:
- Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- From: englishguy2006
- Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- Prev by Date: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- Next by Date: Re: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- Previous by thread: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- Next by thread: Re: Using RAC for 25+ small to medium sized database
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|