Re: Partition Drops is effecting performance adversely...
- From: "MTNorman" <margaret.norman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Sep 2005 08:04:05 -0700
Ravi,
Have you consider using local indexing instead of global indexes? My
1.6T database also uses weekly partitions with local indexes. Several
tables are about 30 million rows per partition or 2 billion rows total.
Stats are collected on the partitions that are loading; older
partition tablespaces are placed into "read only" mode as they age.
Dropping a partition is fast and easy and does not invalidate any
indexes or stored procedures.
Margaret
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Partition Drops is effecting performance adversely...
- From: RaviAlluru
- Re: Partition Drops is effecting performance adversely...
- References:
- Partition Drops is effecting performance adversely...
- From: RaviAlluru
- Partition Drops is effecting performance adversely...
- Prev by Date: Re: Which OS patches to install on HP-UX 11i (11.11) for Oracle 9i R2 (9.2.0.4.0)?
- Next by Date: Re: Record row count and execution time into table?
- Previous by thread: Re: Partition Drops is effecting performance adversely...
- Next by thread: Re: Partition Drops is effecting performance adversely...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|