Re: Digging in to trace files
- From: "EdStevens" <quetico_man@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Aug 2005 05:38:52 -0700
hpuxrac wrote:
> Ed you are probably aware that even though the server is running MTS
> you can create a dedicated connection when you need to correct?
>
Yes, and that is something I still need to address. I know I can set
up separate 'dedicated mode' and 'shared mode' entries in tnsnames, and
that's what I've been doing for my own testing. However, the app uses
JDBC Thin Client, and their connection specification data is held in
some sort of resource file controlled by the administrator of the
middleware. I haven't yet gone down that road to see if there is some
way of specifying to the app to use different types of connections for
different types of work. What is known is that the app that drove us
to shared server by requiring a high number of concurrent sessions ALSO
has some lengthy batch processing. (There are several apps impacting
this db -- it is only used directly by the middleware to hold
'persistence data' for several web-based apps.)
> Most batch jobs should probably be running dedicated anyway and the
> ability to create and then trace a dedicated session to help in the
> debugging is very handy.
>
> *** But I haven't tried Egors utility ( which is EXCELLENT !) on an MTS
> system ... this might help somewhat but there are issues with getting
> all the files depending on number of servers.
Thanks. I'll take a look at it.
.
- References:
- Digging in to trace files
- From: EdStevens
- Re: Digging in to trace files
- From: Jonathan Lewis
- Re: Digging in to trace files
- From: EdStevens
- Re: Digging in to trace files
- From: hpuxrac
- Digging in to trace files
- Prev by Date: Re: Patch 9.2.0.7.0 for windows xp
- Next by Date: Possible to check whether a COMMIT will fail?
- Previous by thread: Re: Digging in to trace files
- Next by thread: standby_file_management question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|