Re: Protecting the encryption key from the DBA
- From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:04:25 +0200
Frank van Bortel wrote:
> Maxim Demenko wrote:
>
>
>>Dump of memory from 0x0CC12C00 to 0x0CC14C00
>>CC12C80 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [................]
>> Repeat 499 times
>>CC14BC0 02012C00 3402C102 EDE7161B 5DA564F3 [.,.....4.....d.]]
>>CC14BD0 6D1CEE34 2DF13D3E F6A88FE7 B18237AB [4..m>=.-.....7..]
>>
>>Decrypted:
>>
>>Dump of memory from 0x0CC12C00 to 0x0CC14C00
>>CC12C80 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [................]
>> Repeat 498 times
>>CC14BB0 00000000 02022C00 0502C102 6978614D [.....,......Maxi]
>>CC14BC0 02002C6D 3402C102 EDE7161B 5DA564F3 [m,.....4.....d.]]
>>
>>The only one encrypted value was "Maxim". Also, as i understand it, TDE
>>doesn't present encrypted data through SQL (decrypting on the fly) , but
>>encryts it in the data files... May be not exactly the feature, many
>>people have expected, but i find it not soo bad. And for encrypted
>>representation via SQL we still have DBMS_CRYPT.
>>
>
>
> Your understanding of TDE is the same as mine.
> You only failed to show the correct blocks: in your encrypted
> part, you show the blocks from CC14BC0 onward, while the
> unencrypted part starts at CC14BB0.
>
> I used grep -a on the datafile, expecting to find *no* match; I found
> a match, so I concluded no encryption had taken place.
>
I have already stated, I should not have used grep (or strings, as
Tom Kyte suggested), but should have made a block dump.
Tom Kyte also pointed out, the data is actually *moved* once
altered to encrypted, or unencrypted.
This is actually the reason, grep or strings will
still find the data - it's the *before* situation...
As the data is moved, that explains the shift in addresses, above.
In case anyone -apart from me- wondered...
--
Regards,
Frank van Bortel
.
- References:
- Protecting the encryption key from the DBA
- From: Pratap
- Re: Protecting the encryption key from the DBA
- From: Sybrand Bakker
- Re: Protecting the encryption key from the DBA
- From: DA Morgan
- Re: Protecting the encryption key from the DBA
- From: Pratap
- Re: Protecting the encryption key from the DBA
- From: DA Morgan
- Re: Protecting the encryption key from the DBA
- From: Frank van Bortel
- Re: Protecting the encryption key from the DBA
- From: Maxim Demenko
- Re: Protecting the encryption key from the DBA
- From: Frank van Bortel
- Protecting the encryption key from the DBA
- Prev by Date: Re: Something strange - am puzzled.
- Next by Date: Re: Toad Alternative(plus a comment on tool costs)
- Previous by thread: Re: Protecting the encryption key from the DBA
- Next by thread: Re: Protecting the encryption key from the DBA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|