Re: XE cursor handling
- From: "japlha" <japlha@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Mar 2007 07:11:42 -0700
On Mar 27, 3:44 am, "Tarby777" <tarbs...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
I hesitate to post this because it sounds silly even to me, but here
goes...
A colleague is adamant that with open_cursors set to the same value in
a 9i database and an XE database, he can complete a certain operation
(in our app) successfully on 9i, but runs out of cursors when he does
the same thing on XE. Can this be true? No-one else is using the
databases...
TIA
Tarby
What version of 9i are you using?
XE and 9i are are different versions therefore they will behave
differently.
If he's running out of cursors, tell him to increase the number in the
XE database.
Can he use SQL_TRACE to trace each session on the different databases
and compare the results?
As to the negative posters (trolls) just ignore them. DBA's are an
interesting breed and seem to have a "god complex".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XE cursor handling
- From: Frank van Bortel
- Re: XE cursor handling
- References:
- XE cursor handling
- From: Tarby777
- XE cursor handling
- Prev by Date: Re: XE cursor handling
- Next by Date: Re: Best Oracle front end / Query tool for power users
- Previous by thread: Re: XE cursor handling
- Next by thread: Re: XE cursor handling
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|