Indirect use of cursors
- From: "Tarby777" <nick_williamson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Oct 2005 05:40:59 -0800
Hi all,
I've been asked to check whether increased cursor usage in an in-house
9iR1 database has been caused by the recent introduction of some PL/SQL
triggers.
The triggers typically fire on insert and/or update, and they don't
explicitly use cursors *at all*; they select, update, insert, return an
error status and so on, but there's zero use of cursors as I understand
them - no DECLARE CURSOR statements, for example.
According to the output of a diagnostic script, some of the tables
associated with the triggers are grabbing (and more importantly, not
releasing, cursors). Is it possible that the triggers can be to blame?
I plan to run some processes with and without the triggers activated,
and to take a look at v$open_cursor, but I'd be interested to know if
anyone has encountered a similar situation already...
TIA
Nick
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Indirect use of cursors
- From: Sybrand Bakker
- Re: Indirect use of cursors
- Prev by Date: Oracle JDBC driver connection properties
- Next by Date: Re: Indirect use of cursors
- Previous by thread: Oracle JDBC driver connection properties
- Next by thread: Re: Indirect use of cursors
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|