Re: Which general SQL NG is more active??
- From: "Dan Guzman" <guzmanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:02:51 GMT
I agree with Roy that the microsoft.public.sqlserver.* hierarchy is much more active. You will also find that more MVPs and Microsoft folks participate there. Also, registered MSDN subscribers are guaranteed a response within 2 business days as part of their MSDN benefits (http://msdn.microsoft.com/newsgroups/).
--
Hope this helps.
Dan Guzman
SQL Server MVP
"tlyczko" <tlyczko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1185491304.409499.66280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is comp.databases.ms-sqlserver more active than
microsoft.public.sqlserver.server, or is it the other way around??
Which NG is better for general and 'learning SQL 2005' types of
questions??
Thank you, Tom
.
- References:
- Which general SQL NG is more active??
- From: tlyczko
- Which general SQL NG is more active??
- Prev by Date: Re: MS SQL IF ELSE condition checking
- Next by Date: Re: Pass Table as a parameter to a function
- Previous by thread: Re: Which general SQL NG is more active??
- Next by thread: setup kerberos authentication for SQL Server 2000
- Index(es):
