Re: needed: 1 + null = 1 (Correction)
- From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:35:23 +0200
On 31.05.2007 10:21, info@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Robert, it does make sense and the schema is build dynamically.
If you say so... To me this rather sounds like a case for
CREATE TABLE PARAMETERS (
item INT NOT NULL,
parameter_name VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,
parameter_value INT NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (
item,
parameter_name
)
)
Of course I don't know all the details...
Kind regards
robert
.
- References:
- needed: 1 + null = 1
- From: info
- Re: needed: 1 + null = 1
- From: Chris.Cheney
- Re: needed: 1 + null = 1
- From: info
- Re: needed: 1 + null = 1
- From: M A Srinivas
- Re: needed: 1 + null = 1
- From: Robert Klemme
- Re: needed: 1 + null = 1
- From: Chris.Cheney
- Re: needed: 1 + null = 1 (Correction)
- From: Chris.Cheney
- Re: needed: 1 + null = 1 (Correction)
- From: info
- needed: 1 + null = 1
- Prev by Date: How to distinguish operation type in trigger?
- Next by Date: Re: How to distinguish operation type in trigger?
- Previous by thread: Re: needed: 1 + null = 1 (Correction)
- Next by thread: Re: needed: 1 + null = 1 (Correction)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|