Re: sql server i/o bottle neck ?
- From: "dunleav1" <jmd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Sep 2006 07:19:38 -0700
dunleav1 wrote:
It's hard to explain the I/O disparity without knowing the details of yourCan you explain this paragraph a little more. I'm not a java guy.
job. My first guess is that you might be committing each SQL Server insert
(default is autocommit) but not each Oracle insert (default is implicit
transactions on). This would require SQL Sever to perform many more
transaction log writes.
Thanks for your help.
Looking at the java code- autocommit is set to false using the
setAutoCommit class.
.
- References:
- sql server i/o bottle neck ?
- From: dunleav1
- Re: sql server i/o bottle neck ?
- From: Dan Guzman
- Re: sql server i/o bottle neck ?
- From: dunleav1
- sql server i/o bottle neck ?
- Prev by Date: Re: sql server i/o bottle neck ?
- Next by Date: Re: Actual and Estimated Rows
- Previous by thread: Re: sql server i/o bottle neck ?
- Next by thread: Synchronizing Access and SQL Server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|