Re: SQL syntax question
- From: Erland Sommarskog <esquel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:24:06 +0000 (UTC)
Helmut Woess (user22@xxxxxxxx) writes:
A real SQL goody - i didn't think that this is possible with one
statement.
My respect, Erland!
At this point I feel obliged to point out that using a table numbers is
not an idea that I have come up with, but something I've picked up by
following the SQL Server newsgroups over the years. I will also have
to admit that as a system developer I am overly fond of using a table
numbers. It's a great idea - until you exceed the highest number in the
table, and your query no longer produces the right result.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx
.
- References:
- SQL syntax question
- From: Zvonko
- Re: SQL syntax question
- From: Erland Sommarskog
- Re: SQL syntax question
- From: Helmut Woess
- SQL syntax question
- Prev by Date: Re: T-SQL CLOSE Connection to DB
- Next by Date: Re: Storing SQL Server Agent logs in a relational store
- Previous by thread: Re: SQL syntax question
- Next by thread: Storing SQL Server Agent logs in a relational store
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|