Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: Erland Sommarskog <esquel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:51:43 +0000 (UTC)
DA Morgan (damorgan@xxxxxxxxx) writes:
Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:
No. When and where did I say "Desktop"? You said it I didn't.
Actually you did by the very fact you said XP. That's an OS intended for
desktop use and as such is tuned very differently than Server 2003.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/default.mspx
You tell that to Microsoft. They don't listen to me. ;-)
I may be dense, but on the top this page, it says:
TechNet Home > Products & Technologies > Desktop Operating Systems
What point were you trying to make?
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx
.
- References:
- SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: Paul
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: Hugo Kornelis
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: Robert Klemme
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: DA Morgan
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: Tony Rogerson
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: DA Morgan
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: Tony Rogerson
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: DA Morgan
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: DA Morgan
- SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- Prev by Date: Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- Next by Date: Re: fmtonly problem (bug ??)
- Previous by thread: Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- Next by thread: Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|