Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle



One factor we routinely see with Oracle is that one can take a single
piece of hardware. First load Oracle on Windows XP SP2 on it and run a
load. Then format the hard disk and perform the exact same test using
RedHat Linux. The difference in scalability and performance is hard to
miss.

So you are comparing an OS mean't for the desktop (XP) against an OS mean't
for a server environment.

Like I say, your bias of anti-MS tunnels your judgement.

If I get some free time I'll try a comparison between linux and windows 2003
r2 server edition which is a more comparable test.

--
Tony Rogerson
SQL Server MVP
http://sqlserverfaq.com - free video tutorials

"DA Morgan" <damorgan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1144897930.909259@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tony Rogerson wrote:
Arrrrr. the lab and tester that has a massive and tunneled bias towards
oracle and is so anti windows that he's bricked up all the windows in his
appartment.

I'm not suprised, based on past evidence that you cannot repro anything
that SQL Server on the windows platform is better at!

I'm not surprised. Much of the resistance to SQL Server has nothing to
do with SQL Server but rather Windows and much of it quite rationally.

One factor we routinely see with Oracle is that one can take a single
piece of hardware. First load Oracle on Windows XP SP2 on it and run a
load. Then format the hard disk and perform the exact same test using
RedHat Linux. The difference in scalability and performance is hard to
miss.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(replace x with u to respond)


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
    ... First load Oracle on Windows XP SP2 on it and run a ... Then format the hard disk and perform the exact same test using ... But the same test has been run against all 32bit Windows Server ...
    (comp.databases.ms-sqlserver)
  • Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
    ... First load Oracle on Windows XP SP2 on it and run a ... Then format the hard disk and perform the exact same test using ... So you are comparing an OS mean't for the desktop against an OS mean't for a server environment. ... But the same test has been run against all 32bit Windows Server ...
    (comp.databases.ms-sqlserver)
  • Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
    ... oracle and is so anti windows that he's bricked up all the windows in his appartment. ... First load Oracle on Windows XP SP2 on it and run a ... Then format the hard disk and perform the exact same test using ...
    (comp.databases.ms-sqlserver)
  • Re: Slow booting xp home.
    ... Changing the boot order to boot first from your hard disk might save you a half second, but you won't be able to boot from a CD until you change it back - and the time spent to do that will erase any previous time saved. ... 2- Consider what software you really want to start with Windows and also how you've configured your applications at startup ... Installing and Registering Visual Studio Express Editions Smart Device ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain)
  • Re: 3 Different BSOD
    ... Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition ... To determine if you have a boot sector virus, run a current virus-checking program, and if needed, disinfect your computer. ... If this does not resolve the issue, your computer mainboard may be damaged. ... 0xC000009D, or STATUS_DEVICE_NOT_CONNECTED, indicates defective or loose cabling, termination, or the controller not seeing the hard disk. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)