Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: "Tony Rogerson" <tonyrogerson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:22:35 +0100
One factor we routinely see with Oracle is that one can take a single
piece of hardware. First load Oracle on Windows XP SP2 on it and run a
load. Then format the hard disk and perform the exact same test using
RedHat Linux. The difference in scalability and performance is hard to
miss.
So you are comparing an OS mean't for the desktop (XP) against an OS mean't
for a server environment.
Like I say, your bias of anti-MS tunnels your judgement.
If I get some free time I'll try a comparison between linux and windows 2003
r2 server edition which is a more comparable test.
--
Tony Rogerson
SQL Server MVP
http://sqlserverfaq.com - free video tutorials
"DA Morgan" <damorgan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1144897930.909259@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tony Rogerson wrote:
Arrrrr. the lab and tester that has a massive and tunneled bias towards
oracle and is so anti windows that he's bricked up all the windows in his
appartment.
I'm not suprised, based on past evidence that you cannot repro anything
that SQL Server on the windows platform is better at!
I'm not surprised. Much of the resistance to SQL Server has nothing to
do with SQL Server but rather Windows and much of it quite rationally.
One factor we routinely see with Oracle is that one can take a single
piece of hardware. First load Oracle on Windows XP SP2 on it and run a
load. Then format the hard disk and perform the exact same test using
RedHat Linux. The difference in scalability and performance is hard to
miss.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(replace x with u to respond)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: DA Morgan
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- References:
- SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: Paul
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: Hugo Kornelis
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: Robert Klemme
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: DA Morgan
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: Tony Rogerson
- Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- From: DA Morgan
- SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- Prev by Date: Re: Killing the process automatically
- Next by Date: Re: SQL Query Question
- Previous by thread: Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- Next by thread: Re: SQL Server 2005 vs Oracle
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|