Re: Simple SQL Distinct...!?
- From: "@sh" <spam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:07:00 +0000 (UTC)
Its basically an application where they've previously had lots of
opportunities to enter delivery address and so there's duplicates as they
enter a new one each time.
I'm adding a page that looks up all 'unique' Delivery Addresses (although
each has a unique DID, DeliveryID), and I want to just show the latest
unique addresses that have the highest DID
So instead of getting this...
, ### Waterleaze, Maidenbrook, Taunton, Somerset, Somerset, TA7 8PS
Test, Ston Easton, Bath, Bath, BA3 4DF
, ### Waterleaze, Maidenbrook, Taunton, Somerset, Somerset, TA7 8PS
, ### Waterleaze, Maidenbrook, Taunton, Somerset, Somerset, TA7 8PS
Test, Ston Easton, Bath, Bath, BA3 4DF
, ### Waterleaze, Maidenbrook, Taunton, Somerset, Somerset, TA7 8PS
You would get this...
, 120 Waterleaze, Maidenbrook, Taunton, Somerset, Somerset, TA7 8PS
Test, Ston Easton, Bath, Bath, BA8 4DF
The DID becomes a hidden value applicable to the radio button for that
address.
Does that make sense? The trouble with the two other suggestions is that the
DID column value doesn't actually become a usable field in the recordset
that I create in ASP.
Cheers, Ash
<markc600@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141051443.398579.176470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For the non-unique addresses, you will have a choice
of DeliveryIDs, which one do you want?
If you want just one of them, you can do this
SELECT MAX(DeliveryID), Address, Organisation, Organisation, Town,
County, PostCode
FROM SOL_Delivery
WHERE CustomerID = 15
GROUP BY Address, Organisation, Organisation, Town,
County, PostCode
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simple SQL Distinct...!?
- From: markc600
- Re: Simple SQL Distinct...!?
- References:
- Simple SQL Distinct...!?
- From: @sh
- Re: Simple SQL Distinct...!?
- From: markc600
- Simple SQL Distinct...!?
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple SQL Distinct...!?
- Next by Date: Re: Simple SQL Distinct...!?
- Previous by thread: Re: Simple SQL Distinct...!?
- Next by thread: Re: Simple SQL Distinct...!?
- Index(es):