do I need a DBA for SQL Server?
- From: "Brian" <barmand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Feb 2006 07:31:46 -0800
We currently run an Oracle 8i db for Oracle Applications 10.7. We are considering moving away from this whole infrastructure to Windows 2003 Server and SQL Server 2005 with a new ERP system. Currently, we have an Oracle DBA under contract who performs all of the maintenance required, plus does any and all fixes to the db when there are problems. What I have been asked, and couldn't comfortably answer, is do we need the same sort of arrangement for SQL Server? We have plenty of Windows server experience in house, but only minor SQL Server experience (I can set up maintenance jobs, backups, user admin, etc.). If something bad happens to the ERP system, and the ERP vendor determines that the problem is not with their app but is with the db itself, how do I get this resolved quickly? Should I have a contract with a 3rd party to cover us should this scenario occur? Thanks for any and all feedback. Regards, Brian .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: do I need a DBA for SQL Server?
- From: Tony Rogerson
- Re: do I need a DBA for SQL Server?
- Prev by Date: Invalid Data for 'Numeric' when EXEC returns empty row
- Next by Date: Re: do I need a DBA for SQL Server?
- Previous by thread: Invalid Data for 'Numeric' when EXEC returns empty row
- Next by thread: Re: do I need a DBA for SQL Server?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading