Re: Identical database w/ identical stored procedures?

Better in terms of what?

I mean, there are risks with using sp_executesql, and you've already
made the decision to split your data (thus minimizing contamination
and/or infiltration) so it seems a bit odd to allow users to jump into
a common database (but there are ways to do this without
sp_executeSQL)...

What's your criteria for defining "better"?

Stu

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: oncologist advice needed
    ... > aware of vhl.org website,thanks for that too.I know about the risks of ... > for your kindness. ... Tests ordered for no good reason are worse than no tests at all. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.med.diseases.cancer)
  • Re: BUSH TOO NOBLE
    ... Nothing is free - just to do his dirty work with our pilots' risks. ... > now Bush is giving us F-15s for free? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (soc.culture.singapore)
  • NULL IV in CBC
    ... I'm desperately looking for a paper / URL / information on the risks ... I've had a look at appendix C of NIST's SP800-38A block cipher modes, ... Axelle. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Oh my, did you see what Bill Clinton just did?
    ... Get involved with reducing the risks of natural ... disasters to different groups around the world. ... - Richard Hutnik ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: RARE For Stud
    ... blind or deaf pupies than be ... informed about the risks? ... Diane Blackman ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.pets.dogs.breeds)