Re: IDENT_CURRENT and empty table
- From: Erland Sommarskog <esquel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:32:56 +0000 (UTC)
Erland Sommarskog (esquel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) writes:
> helmut woess (hw@xxxxxx) writes:
>> Am Sun, 18 Sep 2005 17:58:46 GMT schrieb Dan Guzman:
>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;835188
>>
>> Hmmm, i am not sure what to do with this information. If it is a bug why
>> was it not fixed in one of the next service packs?
>> And there is no definition what the result will be after fixing the bug.
>> And i did not find any information if this bug is fixed in SQL2005.
>
> The behaviour is the same in SQL 2005.
>
> But the funny thing is that Books Online for SQL 2005 explicitly says that
> you should get NULL back in this case...
Got an update: Books Online for 2005 is wrong and will be updated.
The current behaviour will not change, because it could cause compatibility
issues.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/productdoc/2000/books.asp
.
- References:
- IDENT_CURRENT and empty table
- From: helmut woess
- Re: IDENT_CURRENT and empty table
- From: Dan Guzman
- Re: IDENT_CURRENT and empty table
- From: helmut woess
- Re: IDENT_CURRENT and empty table
- From: Erland Sommarskog
- IDENT_CURRENT and empty table
- Prev by Date: Re: How Do I Prevent SQL 2000 From Posting This Message To The Event Viewer - Application Log
- Next by Date: Re: Dynamic data elements for a data collection application
- Previous by thread: Re: IDENT_CURRENT and empty table
- Next by thread: Re: IDENT_CURRENT and empty table
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
