Re: Why the performace differs?
- From: "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" <mooregr_deleteth1s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:04:31 GMT
"Mohamed Gad" <mohamed.gad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7RYQe.1422$yn2.1342@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> >Does one have logging enabled and the other doesn't?
>
> How would i know weather the Logging is enabled or not?
Go into Enterprise manager and check the properties of the DB.
It should be FULL, Bulk Logged or Simple.
>
>
>
> >What about the disk subsystem?
> I don't get it.. do you mean the
> FAT Type if so? Both are NTFS Partitions
No, I mean the layout and type of disks.
RAID vs non-RAID (and type of RAID).
ATA vs SATA vs SCSI etc.
Log files on same physical drive(s) as data files. Location of temp db?
>
> Thank you soo much for your reply, but, I hope i would find a solution.
Well, we're trying to help.
>
>
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why the performace differs?
- From: Mohamed Gad
- Re: Why the performace differs?
- References:
- Re: Why the performace differs?
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- Re: Why the performace differs?
- From: Mohamed Gad
- Re: Why the performace differs?
- Prev by Date: restore problem about sql server
- Next by Date: Re: Installing SQLServer 2000 service packs on Clustered server
- Previous by thread: Re: Why the performace differs?
- Next by thread: Re: Why the performace differs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|