Re: Dates and pickers with linked tables to SQL Server
- From: "Larry Linson" <bouncer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:44:01 GMT
"lyle fairfield" <lyle.fairfield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
We can say how linked tables will work
99.44% of the time. If that's good enough,
then I think linked tables via ODBC are
a good idea.
Hmm. We have always tested enough to find any incompatibilities before
"going live" so the user audience wouldn't encounter the little surprises of
which life is full, at least not due to our work. Dates have always had to
be treated with care, no matter what two different engines are involved, and
developers don't have to be extensively experienced to know that -- I know
you already knew it, Lyle.
Oh, me, when will that banked snow be plowed away or melt so you can get
out? :-)
.
- References:
- Dates and pickers with linked tables to SQL Server
- From: Astley Le Jasper
- Re: Dates and pickers with linked tables to SQL Server
- From: MGFoster
- Re: Dates and pickers with linked tables to SQL Server
- From: Astley Le Jasper
- Re: Dates and pickers with linked tables to SQL Server
- From: Albert D. Kallal
- Re: Dates and pickers with linked tables to SQL Server
- From: lyle fairfield
- Re: Dates and pickers with linked tables to SQL Server
- From: Albert D. Kallal
- Re: Dates and pickers with linked tables to SQL Server
- From: lyle fairfield
- Dates and pickers with linked tables to SQL Server
- Prev by Date: Re: Dates and pickers with linked tables to SQL Server
- Next by Date: Re: Access to SQL Server over the web
- Previous by thread: Re: Dates and pickers with linked tables to SQL Server
- Next by thread: Re: Dates and pickers with linked tables to SQL Server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading