Re: Access front end for sql server

I think this is not correct, For instance, Access 2003 ADPs allow
setting an ADO recordset as a report's recordset. Access 2002 ADPs,
(nor any MDBs, TTBOMK) does not have this capability.

The general notion among MDB aficionados that ADPs are separate but
equal is prompted, IMO, by the those aficionados' lack of ADP
experience. ADPs are superior creatures in many ways.

On Jun 28, 1:04 pm, "Tony Toews [MVP]" <tto...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tom van Stiphout <no.spam.tom7...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

It appears MSFT is phasing out support for ADP.

MSFT certainly haven't made any enhancements to ADPs for the last few versions.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Access front end for sql server
    ... I haven't tried it yet after SP1 came out, ... setting an ADO recordset as a report's recordset. ... Access 2002 ADPs, ... The general notion among MDB aficionados that ADPs are separate but ...
    (comp.databases.ms-access)
  • Re: Dynamic recordset
    ... one can load a form with an ADO recordset that is updateable. ... I don't think we are talking about ADPs here, since, by definition, ... usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/ ...
    (microsoft.public.access.forms)
  • Re: adp vs mdb
    ... only options for Access development are MDB and ADP, ... has been recommending MDB over ADP for a couple of years now. ... MDBs with ODBC perform better than ADPs, ...
    (microsoft.public.access.adp.sqlserver)
  • Re: adp vs mdb
    ... how is MDB linked tables LESS LAYERS than just OLEDB? ... only options for Access development are MDB and ADP, ... MDBs with ODBC perform better than ADPs, ...
    (microsoft.public.access.adp.sqlserver)
  • Re: AutoNumber feild
    ... and not using adps. ... mdbs, though bound to linked tables, is not it? ... >> I used to have autonumber in the form which gives the ... >> Is there any way to display the autonumber before the ...
    (microsoft.public.access.adp.sqlserver)